Inquiring to understand

Abstract We often inquire not just to know, but to understand. In this paper, I give an account of inquiries that aim to illuminate or makes sense of their object and argue they don’t reduce to inquiries which concern forming beliefs or acquiring knowledge. My core claim is that inquiry aimed at understanding is a constructive and generative process, unlike inquiry aiming at knowledge acquisition, which culminates in the representation of pre-existing facts. Central to this process are sensemaking frames—representational devices that interpret their target by structuring and organizing information about it. To that end, I propose and defend the noetic account of inquiry, according to which epistemic improvement in inquiry is a matter of structuring information to illuminate and make sense of the object of inquiry. I conclude by explaining how inquiring to understand is distinctively open-ended, a constructive process of structuring the information landscape, a landscape which isn’t always readily given to us.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Philosophical Quarterly
Published
2025-11-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/pq/pqaf098
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
34.53
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Inquiring to understand

Adham El Shazly
2 citations
The Philosophical Quarterly
Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics
34.53
article

Inquiring to understand

Adham El Shazly
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Abstract We often inquire not just to know, but to understand. In this paper, I give an account of inquiries that aim to illuminate or makes sense of their object and argue they don’t reduce to inquiries which concern forming beliefs or acquiring knowledge. My core claim is that inquiry aimed at understanding is a constructive and generative process, unlike inquiry aiming at knowledge acquisition, which culminates in the representation of pre-existing facts. Central to this process are sensemaking frames—representational devices that interpret their target by structuring and organizing information about it. To that end, I propose and defend the noetic account of inquiry, according to which epistemic improvement in inquiry is a matter of structuring information to illuminate and make sense of the object of inquiry. I conclude by explaining how inquiring to understand is distinctively open-ended, a constructive process of structuring the information landscape, a landscape which isn’t always readily given to us.

The Philosophical Quarterly
University of Cambridge (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 0%
Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics
34.53
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.