Assessing the potential of LLMs as crowdworkers for contextual information generation

Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown remarkable capabilities, demonstrating their potential to transform the Natural Language Processing (NLP) field by achieving strong performance across the entire spectrum of tasks. In this context, there is growing interest in leveraging LLMs as automated crowdworkers to streamline the traditionally labor-intensive process of manual annotation and linguistic content generation. This paper specifically examines the feasibility of using LLMs to generate high-quality contextual information — an increasingly recognized element for enhancing generative systems — by producing linguistic contexts from given premise sentences. We evaluate four prominent LLMs — LLaMA 2, PaLM 2, Vicuna, and GPT-3.5 — by making them generate 180 contextual outputs, which are then compared to 60 contexts manually crafted by linguistic experts. To systematically assess the appropriateness of these generated contexts, we introduce CATS (Contextual Appropriateness in Texts for Spanish), a novel and adaptable evaluation metric for measuring the appropriateness of contextual information generated texts. CATS is rooted in established discourse theories and provides a robust framework for analyzing linguistic context quality. The implementation of CATS is made publicly available at https://github.com/gplsi/cats . The reliability of CATS is validated through a manual evaluation conducted by two independent human referees. The results indicate that the quality of contexts generated by LLMs is comparable to those produced by human specialists, as evidenced by both CATS scores (0.214 vs. 0.150) and human judgment. Our findings underscore the efficiency and cost-effectiveness of employing LLMs as alternatives to human crowdworkers for generating contextual information, offering promising implications for the scalability and advancement of generative systems. • A study demonstrating the potential of large language models (LLMs) in evaluating tasks that are resource-intensive for humans. • Introduction of a novel research direction through the generation of contextual information. • Proposal of a new metric for assessing contextual information in Spanish.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Information Processing & Management
Published
2025-11-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipm.2025.104486
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Text Readability and Simplification
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.48
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessing the potential of LLMs as crowdworkers for contextual information generation

Armando Suárez Cueto, Elena Lloret, María Miró Maestre, Paloma Moreda et al.
1 citations
Information Processing & Management
Text Readability and Simplification
2.48
article

Assessing the potential of LLMs as crowdworkers for contextual information generation

Armando Suárez Cueto, Elena Lloret, María Miró Maestre, Paloma Moreda, Iván Martínez-Murillo
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown remarkable capabilities, demonstrating their potential to transform the Natural Language Processing (NLP) field by achieving strong performance across the entire spectrum of tasks. In this context, there is growing interest in leveraging LLMs as automated crowdworkers to streamline the traditionally labor-intensive process of manual annotation and linguistic content generation. This paper specifically examines the feasibility of using LLMs to generate high-quality contextual information — an increasingly recognized element for enhancing generative systems — by producing linguistic contexts from given premise sentences. We evaluate four prominent LLMs — LLaMA 2, PaLM 2, Vicuna, and GPT-3.5 — by making them generate 180 contextual outputs, which are then compared to 60 contexts manually crafted by linguistic experts. To systematically assess the appropriateness of these generated contexts, we introduce CATS (Contextual Appropriateness in Texts for Spanish), a novel and adaptable evaluation metric for measuring the appropriateness of contextual information generated texts. CATS is rooted in established discourse theories and provides a robust framework for analyzing linguistic context quality. The implementation of CATS is made publicly available at https://github.com/gplsi/cats . The reliability of CATS is validated through a manual evaluation conducted by two independent human referees. The results indicate that the quality of contexts generated by LLMs is comparable to those produced by human specialists, as evidenced by both CATS scores (0.214 vs. 0.150) and human judgment. Our findings underscore the efficiency and cost-effectiveness of employing LLMs as alternatives to human crowdworkers for generating contextual information, offering promising implications for the scalability and advancement of generative systems. • A study demonstrating the potential of large language models (LLMs) in evaluating tasks that are resource-intensive for humans. • Introduction of a novel research direction through the generation of contextual information. • Proposal of a new metric for assessing contextual information in Spanish.

Information Processing & ManagementVol. 63(3)
University of Alicante (ES)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Text Readability and Simplification
2.48
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.