Coping with career insecurity in the early career stage: the moderating role of ambiguity tolerance

Purpose Career insecurity is an important issue for individuals in their early career stages. On the basis of stress and resource theories, we postulate career insecurity as a stressor that initiates the use of coping strategies (i.e. approach and avoidance coping), depending on personal resources such as ambiguity tolerance (i.e. preference for or aversion to ambiguity). We further posit that approach and avoidance coping have consequences for psychological well-being and subjective career success. Design/methodology/approach Survey data were collected at two time points with a one-month timespan among early-career individuals in Italy (N = 411). Findings Path analyses showed that career insecurity was negatively related to approach coping and positively related to avoidance coping. Ambiguity tolerance played a moderating role in which preference for ambiguity weakened the career insecurity-avoidance coping relationship. Furthermore, approach coping mediated the negative relationships between career insecurity and the two outcomes (i.e. psychological well-being, subjective career success). Practical implications The findings suggest that promoting approach coping and a preference for ambiguity may reduce the maladaptive outcomes of career insecurity among early career individuals. Originality/value The study uncovers the unique roles of coping strategies and personal resources in the associations between career insecurity and individual outcomes in the early career stage.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Career Development International
Published
2025-11-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/cdi-05-2024-0197
Primary Topic
Career Development and Diversity
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Coping with career insecurity in the early career stage: the moderating role of ambiguity tolerance

Rita Chiesa, Audrey Ansay Antonio, Edwin A. J. van Hooft
Career Development International
Career Development and Diversity
article

Coping with career insecurity in the early career stage: the moderating role of ambiguity tolerance

Rita Chiesa, Audrey Ansay Antonio, Edwin A. J. van Hooft
article en

Abstract

Purpose Career insecurity is an important issue for individuals in their early career stages. On the basis of stress and resource theories, we postulate career insecurity as a stressor that initiates the use of coping strategies (i.e. approach and avoidance coping), depending on personal resources such as ambiguity tolerance (i.e. preference for or aversion to ambiguity). We further posit that approach and avoidance coping have consequences for psychological well-being and subjective career success. Design/methodology/approach Survey data were collected at two time points with a one-month timespan among early-career individuals in Italy (N = 411). Findings Path analyses showed that career insecurity was negatively related to approach coping and positively related to avoidance coping. Ambiguity tolerance played a moderating role in which preference for ambiguity weakened the career insecurity-avoidance coping relationship. Furthermore, approach coping mediated the negative relationships between career insecurity and the two outcomes (i.e. psychological well-being, subjective career success). Practical implications The findings suggest that promoting approach coping and a preference for ambiguity may reduce the maladaptive outcomes of career insecurity among early career individuals. Originality/value The study uncovers the unique roles of coping strategies and personal resources in the associations between career insecurity and individual outcomes in the early career stage.

Career Development InternationalVol. 31(8)
GNA University (IN), Amsterdam University of Applied Sciences (NL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 64%
Career Development and Diversity
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.