Communities of practice and innovation: a review and research agenda

Purpose This study aims to explore the role of communities of practice (CoPs) in supporting organizational innovation. It provides a thorough review of how CoPs contribute to or shape innovation and concludes with an agenda for future research. Design/methodology/approach A hybrid narrative approach examines the existing research literature on CoPs and their impact on innovation. This review incorporates mainstream databases as well as an artificial intelligence tool. Findings The literature highlights three overarching themes: (1) innovation in informal CoPs, focusing on knowledge sharing and creation as key mechanisms driving innovation through knowledge management, the development of meta-capabilities and enhanced social capital; (2) innovation at the boundaries of communities, exploring how interactions between CoPs and connections with external communities promote innovation via boundary-spanning practices; and (3) innovation in organizational CoPs (OCoPs), examining how the dynamic interplay between autonomy and organizational objectives shapes OCoPs’ innovation potential. Research limitations/implications Future research should empirically examine how boundary-spanning activities (in and between communities) and proactive leadership of communities optimize measurable innovation outcomes, both within and beyond organizational frontiers. This calls for theorizing CoPs not merely as mechanisms for knowledge creation, but as pivotal structures that orchestrate, modulate and sustain an open and adaptive form of organizational ambidexterity. Originality/value To the best of authors’ knowledge, this study presents the first in-depth literature review on the relationship between CoPs and innovation, leveraging a combination of traditional academic sources and artificial intelligence tools.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Knowledge Management
Published
2025-11-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/jkm-01-2025-0106
Primary Topic
Knowledge Management and Sharing
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Communities of practice and innovation: a review and research agenda

Aurore Haas, Jean‐Philippe Bootz, Stefano Borzillo
Journal of Knowledge Management
Knowledge Management and Sharing
article

Communities of practice and innovation: a review and research agenda

Aurore Haas, Jean‐Philippe Bootz, Stefano Borzillo
article en

Abstract

Purpose This study aims to explore the role of communities of practice (CoPs) in supporting organizational innovation. It provides a thorough review of how CoPs contribute to or shape innovation and concludes with an agenda for future research. Design/methodology/approach A hybrid narrative approach examines the existing research literature on CoPs and their impact on innovation. This review incorporates mainstream databases as well as an artificial intelligence tool. Findings The literature highlights three overarching themes: (1) innovation in informal CoPs, focusing on knowledge sharing and creation as key mechanisms driving innovation through knowledge management, the development of meta-capabilities and enhanced social capital; (2) innovation at the boundaries of communities, exploring how interactions between CoPs and connections with external communities promote innovation via boundary-spanning practices; and (3) innovation in organizational CoPs (OCoPs), examining how the dynamic interplay between autonomy and organizational objectives shapes OCoPs’ innovation potential. Research limitations/implications Future research should empirically examine how boundary-spanning activities (in and between communities) and proactive leadership of communities optimize measurable innovation outcomes, both within and beyond organizational frontiers. This calls for theorizing CoPs not merely as mechanisms for knowledge creation, but as pivotal structures that orchestrate, modulate and sustain an open and adaptive form of organizational ambidexterity. Originality/value To the best of authors’ knowledge, this study presents the first in-depth literature review on the relationship between CoPs and innovation, leveraging a combination of traditional academic sources and artificial intelligence tools.

Journal of Knowledge ManagementVol. 30(3)
HES-SO University of Applied Sciences and Arts Western Switzerland (CH), Universidade Católica Portuguesa (PT), EM Strasbourg Business School (FR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 59%
Knowledge Management and Sharing
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.