Review of Labor Law Issues Surrounding the Restructuring of Universities

This article examines the issue of dismissal for business reasons, a highly likely consequence of university faculty being dismissed from their positions at financially distressed universities, even if they haven't gone bankrupt, from a labor law perspective. Before the university restructuring period, university faculty in Korea were generally treated as outside the scope of labor law. Instead, there was a strong tendency to believe that their status was sufficiently governed by education-related laws, such as the Private School Act and the Higher Education Act. However, these laws were enacted during a period of continuous quantitative growth in Korean higher education institutions, and many of their provisions are inappropriate for the current university environment, which has entered a period of restructuring. Then, in 2018, the Constitutional Court ruled that university faculty have the right to organize. With the restructuring period upon us, there was no choice but to actively incorporate university faculty into the protections of labor law. Around the same time, the need for appropriate legislative reforms to education-related laws also emerged, fueled by the restructuring. One such outcome was the &quotAct on Support for Structural Improvement of Private Universities.&quot The Private University Restructuring Support Act reveals that the restructuring of our universities has become a very real issue. Therefore, we examined the labor law issues related to university faculty that arose with the <br/>enactment of the &quotAct on Support for Restructuring Private Universities.&quot Ultimately, this labor law issue concerned whether Article 56, Paragraph 1 of the Private School Act, which previously recognized the possibility of closure and dismissal, could remain the sole provision protecting faculty in the face of university restructuring that entails dismissals for business reasons.<br/> This article focuses on the legal doctrine of dismissal for business reasons and examines its applicability to faculty at private universities, particularly those facing financial difficulties. In conclusion, we confirm that the legal doctrine of dismissal for business reasons can be applied without issue to mergers and consolidations of departments or faculties, closures of departments, and transfers of educational businesses to prevent financial distress.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Labor Law Forum
Published
2025-11-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.46329/llf.2025.11.46.319
Primary Topic
Legal Issues in Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Review of Labor Law Issues Surrounding the Restructuring of Universities

Yun-Ku Chun
Labor Law Forum
Legal Issues in Education
article

Review of Labor Law Issues Surrounding the Restructuring of Universities

Yun-Ku Chun
article en

Abstract

This article examines the issue of dismissal for business reasons, a highly likely consequence of university faculty being dismissed from their positions at financially distressed universities, even if they haven't gone bankrupt, from a labor law perspective. Before the university restructuring period, university faculty in Korea were generally treated as outside the scope of labor law. Instead, there was a strong tendency to believe that their status was sufficiently governed by education-related laws, such as the Private School Act and the Higher Education Act. However, these laws were enacted during a period of continuous quantitative growth in Korean higher education institutions, and many of their provisions are inappropriate for the current university environment, which has entered a period of restructuring. Then, in 2018, the Constitutional Court ruled that university faculty have the right to organize. With the restructuring period upon us, there was no choice but to actively incorporate university faculty into the protections of labor law. Around the same time, the need for appropriate legislative reforms to education-related laws also emerged, fueled by the restructuring. One such outcome was the &quotAct on Support for Structural Improvement of Private Universities.&quot The Private University Restructuring Support Act reveals that the restructuring of our universities has become a very real issue. Therefore, we examined the labor law issues related to university faculty that arose with the <br/>enactment of the &quotAct on Support for Restructuring Private Universities.&quot Ultimately, this labor law issue concerned whether Article 56, Paragraph 1 of the Private School Act, which previously recognized the possibility of closure and dismissal, could remain the sole provision protecting faculty in the face of university restructuring that entails dismissals for business reasons.<br/> This article focuses on the legal doctrine of dismissal for business reasons and examines its applicability to faculty at private universities, particularly those facing financial difficulties. In conclusion, we confirm that the legal doctrine of dismissal for business reasons can be applied without issue to mergers and consolidations of departments or faculties, closures of departments, and transfers of educational businesses to prevent financial distress.

Labor Law ForumVol. 46
Openalex Percentile: Top 48%
Legal Issues in Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Review of Labor Law Issues Surrounding the Restructuring of Universities — Yun-Ku Chun · Labor Law Forum (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS