Effects of LLM use and note-taking on reading comprehension and memory: A randomised experiment in secondary schools

Students' rapid uptake of Generative Artificial Intelligence tools, particularly large language models (LLMs), raises urgent questions about their effects on learning. We compared the impact of LLM use to that of traditional note-taking, or a combination of both, on secondary school students' reading comprehension and retention. We conducted a pre-registered, randomised controlled experiment with within- and between-participant design elements in schools in England. 405 students, aged 14–15 years, studied two text passages and completed comprehension and retention tests three days later. Quantitative results demonstrated that both note-taking alone and combined with LLM use had significant positive effects on retention and comprehension compared to using the LLM alone. Yet, most students preferred using the LLM over note-taking, and perceived it as more helpful. Qualitative results revealed that many students valued the LLM for making complex material more accessible and reducing cognitive load, while they appreciated note-taking for promoting deeper engagement and aiding memory. Additionally, we identified “archetypes” of prompting behaviour, offering insights into the different ways students interacted with the LLM. Overall, our findings suggest that, while note-taking promotes cognitive engagement and long-term comprehension and retention, LLMs may facilitate initial understanding and student interest. The study reveals the continued importance of traditional learning activities, the benefits of combining LLM use with traditional learning over using LLMs alone, and the AI skills that students need to maximise those benefits. • Compared effects of LLM use to note-taking, or a combination of both, on learning. • Note-taking boosted comprehension and retention relative to only using LLMs. • Students generally preferred LLM use over note-taking and found it more helpful. • Students primarily used LLMs to seek deeper, contextualised understanding. • AI tools must be integrated thoughtfully to enhance, not bypass, active learning.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Computers & Education
Published
2025-11-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2025.105514
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.24
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Effects of LLM use and note-taking on reading comprehension and memory: A randomised experiment in secondary schools

Daniel G. Goldstein, Mina Lee, Sean Rintel, Abigail Sellen et al.
2 citations
Computers & Education
Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes
4.24
article

Effects of LLM use and note-taking on reading comprehension and memory: A randomised experiment in secondary schools

Daniel G. Goldstein, Mina Lee, Sean Rintel, Abigail Sellen, David M. Rothschild, Martina Kuvalja, Pia Kreijkes, Lev Tankelevitch, Sylvia Vitello, Viktor Kewenig, Jake M. Hofman, Tim Oates
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Students' rapid uptake of Generative Artificial Intelligence tools, particularly large language models (LLMs), raises urgent questions about their effects on learning. We compared the impact of LLM use to that of traditional note-taking, or a combination of both, on secondary school students' reading comprehension and retention. We conducted a pre-registered, randomised controlled experiment with within- and between-participant design elements in schools in England. 405 students, aged 14–15 years, studied two text passages and completed comprehension and retention tests three days later. Quantitative results demonstrated that both note-taking alone and combined with LLM use had significant positive effects on retention and comprehension compared to using the LLM alone. Yet, most students preferred using the LLM over note-taking, and perceived it as more helpful. Qualitative results revealed that many students valued the LLM for making complex material more accessible and reducing cognitive load, while they appreciated note-taking for promoting deeper engagement and aiding memory. Additionally, we identified “archetypes” of prompting behaviour, offering insights into the different ways students interacted with the LLM. Overall, our findings suggest that, while note-taking promotes cognitive engagement and long-term comprehension and retention, LLMs may facilitate initial understanding and student interest. The study reveals the continued importance of traditional learning activities, the benefits of combining LLM use with traditional learning over using LLMs alone, and the AI skills that students need to maximise those benefits. • Compared effects of LLM use to note-taking, or a combination of both, on learning. • Note-taking boosted comprehension and retention relative to only using LLMs. • Students generally preferred LLM use over note-taking and found it more helpful. • Students primarily used LLMs to seek deeper, contextualised understanding. • AI tools must be integrated thoughtfully to enhance, not bypass, active learning.

Computers & EducationVol. 243
Microsoft (United States) (US), Cambridge University Press (GB), Microsoft Research (United Kingdom) (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes
4.24
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.