Longitudinal associations between socioeconomic status and executive function during adolescence: Evidence from the SCAMP study

Few studies have isolated associations between socioeconomic status (SES) and executive function (EF) in adolescence, when EF inequalities may be particularly consequential for academic attainment. Using data from the Study of Cognition, Adolescents and Mobile Phones ( n = 2726) and multiple regressions, we evaluated relationships between SES indices (parental education and occupation, area-level deprivation, and household poverty) and EF tasks, controlling for demographic factors. Replicating findings from childhood, latent SES and EF measures associated cross-sectionally at age 12 (β = 0.11, [0.07, 0.15]). We further observed a small increase in the socioeconomic EF gradient between 12 and 14 years (β = 0.07, [0.04, 0.11]), with which was specifically associated with parental occupation and household poverty. Working memory span tasks were particularly sensitive to SES. Our results highlight specific SES-EF associations during adolescence and could help identify pupils at risk for cognitive, and therefore academic, challenges who may benefit from targeted support. Individual differences in EF skills associate with educational outcomes across development, as well as health and occupational outcomes in adulthood. This study demonstrates that, in a UK sample, SES not only associates with individual differences in EF in childhood, but that over a period as short as two years, parental occupation and household poverty (but not parental education or area deprivation), associate with small but significant increasing differences in adolescents' working memory skills. By isolating specific associations between aspects of SES and EF inequalities, this study suggests family level factors have an enduring influence on cognitive skills into adolescence, which may contribute to the trend of increasing attainment inequalities seen in this age group. The findings help to narrow the pool of likely causal explanations for social inequalities in EF skills and may help to identify pupils who are at risk for cognitive, and therefore academic, challenges. • We used data from a longitudinal cohort study of teenagers from London (England) • Different aspects of SES were considered • The SES gradient in EF skills widened during early adolescence • Household poverty and parental occupation were associated with EF development • Working memory span tasks showed the strongest association with SES

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Learning and Individual Differences
Published
2025-11-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2025.102822
Primary Topic
Stress Responses and Cortisol
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Longitudinal associations between socioeconomic status and executive function during adolescence: Evidence from the SCAMP study

Andrew Tolmie, Chen Shen, Iroise Dumontheil, Mireille B. Toledano et al.
Learning and Individual Differences
Stress Responses and Cortisol
article

Longitudinal associations between socioeconomic status and executive function during adolescence: Evidence from the SCAMP study

Andrew Tolmie, Chen Shen, Iroise Dumontheil, Mireille B. Toledano, Martin Röösli, Michael S. C. Thomas, Elizabeth R. Booth, Roisin C. Perry
article en

Abstract

Few studies have isolated associations between socioeconomic status (SES) and executive function (EF) in adolescence, when EF inequalities may be particularly consequential for academic attainment. Using data from the Study of Cognition, Adolescents and Mobile Phones ( n = 2726) and multiple regressions, we evaluated relationships between SES indices (parental education and occupation, area-level deprivation, and household poverty) and EF tasks, controlling for demographic factors. Replicating findings from childhood, latent SES and EF measures associated cross-sectionally at age 12 (β = 0.11, [0.07, 0.15]). We further observed a small increase in the socioeconomic EF gradient between 12 and 14 years (β = 0.07, [0.04, 0.11]), with which was specifically associated with parental occupation and household poverty. Working memory span tasks were particularly sensitive to SES. Our results highlight specific SES-EF associations during adolescence and could help identify pupils at risk for cognitive, and therefore academic, challenges who may benefit from targeted support. Individual differences in EF skills associate with educational outcomes across development, as well as health and occupational outcomes in adulthood. This study demonstrates that, in a UK sample, SES not only associates with individual differences in EF in childhood, but that over a period as short as two years, parental occupation and household poverty (but not parental education or area deprivation), associate with small but significant increasing differences in adolescents' working memory skills. By isolating specific associations between aspects of SES and EF inequalities, this study suggests family level factors have an enduring influence on cognitive skills into adolescence, which may contribute to the trend of increasing attainment inequalities seen in this age group. The findings help to narrow the pool of likely causal explanations for social inequalities in EF skills and may help to identify pupils who are at risk for cognitive, and therefore academic, challenges. • We used data from a longitudinal cohort study of teenagers from London (England) • Different aspects of SES were considered • The SES gradient in EF skills widened during early adolescence • Household poverty and parental occupation were associated with EF development • Working memory span tasks showed the strongest association with SES

Learning and Individual DifferencesVol. 125
Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute (CH), The University of Melbourne (AU), University of West London (GB), IEEE Computer Society (US), Imperial College London (GB), Australian Psychological Society (AU), Birkbeck, University of London (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 61%
Stress Responses and Cortisol
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.