Nurses’ experiences of moral suffering: A qualitative interview study

BackgroundMoral suffering is a growing concern in healthcare, especially in the nursing profession. It encompasses various forms, such as moral distress and moral injury, both of which impact nurses' professional integrity and mental and physical health. Despite extensive research, there is still no consensus on their definitions, distinctions, or causes, which impedes effective interventions. However, given their overlapping characteristics and consequences, joint consideration could offer critical insights to refine existing concepts.AimTo explore how nurses in clinical practice perceive moral suffering and analyze the essence of their experience of moral suffering.Research designData were collected through qualitative, semi-structured online interviews. The interview transcripts were analyzed using qualitative content analysis.Participants and research contextA total of 47 registered nurses from different clinical settings in German hospitals participated in the study.Ethical considerationsThe study protocol was approved by the Institutional Review Board at University Medicine Greifswald. All participants provided written informed consent.FindingsThe essence of moral suffering was determined in five main categories with corresponding subcategories: A trigger situation (1) in which a person in a specific moral disposition is present (2), whereupon they assess the situation as morally meaningful (3) and, accordingly, moral suffering is experienced in its three specific dimensions: (4) the <i>characteristics</i> (dynamic, context-dependence, temporality, fuzziness), <i>dimensions of experience</i> (rational and emotional integrity-related manifestation), and <i>dimensions of action</i> (handling, coping, prevention). This experience of moral suffering has consequences (5).ConclusionsThis study illuminates the complex nature of moral suffering among nurses, revealing its multidimensional essence and the interplay between personal and professional factors. The results underscore the need for a systemic approach to address moral suffering in nursing, emphasizing the importance of ethical leadership and workplace health promotion, and fostering shared values within healthcare teams.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Nursing Ethics
Published
2025-11-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/09697330251395211
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Ethics in medical practice
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.82
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Nurses’ experiences of moral suffering: A qualitative interview study

Anna‐Henrikje Seidlein, Michael Schilder, Tobias Mai, Radia Miskine et al.
1 citations
Nursing Ethics
Ethics in medical practice
2.82
article

Nurses’ experiences of moral suffering: A qualitative interview study

Anna‐Henrikje Seidlein, Michael Schilder, Tobias Mai, Radia Miskine, Alica Schöner
article en
1 citations

Abstract

BackgroundMoral suffering is a growing concern in healthcare, especially in the nursing profession. It encompasses various forms, such as moral distress and moral injury, both of which impact nurses' professional integrity and mental and physical health. Despite extensive research, there is still no consensus on their definitions, distinctions, or causes, which impedes effective interventions. However, given their overlapping characteristics and consequences, joint consideration could offer critical insights to refine existing concepts.AimTo explore how nurses in clinical practice perceive moral suffering and analyze the essence of their experience of moral suffering.Research designData were collected through qualitative, semi-structured online interviews. The interview transcripts were analyzed using qualitative content analysis.Participants and research contextA total of 47 registered nurses from different clinical settings in German hospitals participated in the study.Ethical considerationsThe study protocol was approved by the Institutional Review Board at University Medicine Greifswald. All participants provided written informed consent.FindingsThe essence of moral suffering was determined in five main categories with corresponding subcategories: A trigger situation (1) in which a person in a specific moral disposition is present (2), whereupon they assess the situation as morally meaningful (3) and, accordingly, moral suffering is experienced in its three specific dimensions: (4) the <i>characteristics</i> (dynamic, context-dependence, temporality, fuzziness), <i>dimensions of experience</i> (rational and emotional integrity-related manifestation), and <i>dimensions of action</i> (handling, coping, prevention). This experience of moral suffering has consequences (5).ConclusionsThis study illuminates the complex nature of moral suffering among nurses, revealing its multidimensional essence and the interplay between personal and professional factors. The results underscore the need for a systemic approach to address moral suffering in nursing, emphasizing the importance of ethical leadership and workplace health promotion, and fostering shared values within healthcare teams.

Nursing EthicsVol. 33(2)
Goethe University Frankfurt (DE), Universitätsmedizin Greifswald (DE), University Hospital Frankfurt (DE), Evangelische Hochschule Darmstadt (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Ethics in medical practice
2.82
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.