Examining the efficacy of risk relievers in online shopping: a market segmentation analysis

Purpose It has been well-documented in the consumer behavior literature that risk relievers play an important role in reducing perceived risk. However, the research on the efficacy of risk relievers in segmenting online customers is scant. Thus, this study aims to investigate the usefulness of risk relievers in online shopping by presenting a cluster analysis of consumer risk reduction behavior based on risk-reliever utility scores and to understand whether these risk-reliever segments differ on the basis of perceived risk dimensions and purchase intention. Design/methodology/approach The data were collected from a survey of 677 customers using a nonprobability sampling technique. A two-step cluster analysis, using hierarchical and nonhierarchical clustering, was conducted on risk-reliever utility scores to segment the customers based on their risk reduction behavior. Furthermore, multivariate discriminant analysis was used to validate the results of cluster analysis. The segments were profiled based on their sociodemographic and behavioral characteristics. Later, one-way analysis of variance was applied to identify differences in the dimensions of perceived risk and purchase intention across clusters. Findings The cluster analysis on the risk-reliever utility scores yielded a classification of customers into four groups − maximum security seekers, minimum security seekers, information seekers and guarantee seekers. Discriminant analysis confirmed the validity of the four-cluster solution. Research limitations/implications This study contributes to the existing literature on risk relievers by augmenting a new perspective of customer segmentation based on their risk reduction behavior. The findings are limited to the cultural context of the study. The researchers are, therefore, encouraged to extend the clustering approach to other developing countries to enhance the generalizability of the results. Practical implications The classification of customers provides better knowledge to the service providers about the preferences of risk relievers by different user segments. It offers valuable insights into the understanding of customers’ risk reduction behavior that will influence marketers to adopt different strategies for each segment to the alleviation of risk perception. Originality/value The originality of the research is its novelty in examining risk reduction as a segmentation variable to guide marketers toward adopting effective risk reduction strategies based on the personality and behavioral characteristics of each user segment.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Asia Business Studies
Published
2025-11-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/jabs-01-2024-0012
Primary Topic
Customer Service Quality and Loyalty
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Examining the efficacy of risk relievers in online shopping: a market segmentation analysis

Simarpreet Kaur, Sangeeta Arora
Journal of Asia Business Studies
Customer Service Quality and Loyalty
article

Examining the efficacy of risk relievers in online shopping: a market segmentation analysis

Simarpreet Kaur, Sangeeta Arora
article en

Abstract

Purpose It has been well-documented in the consumer behavior literature that risk relievers play an important role in reducing perceived risk. However, the research on the efficacy of risk relievers in segmenting online customers is scant. Thus, this study aims to investigate the usefulness of risk relievers in online shopping by presenting a cluster analysis of consumer risk reduction behavior based on risk-reliever utility scores and to understand whether these risk-reliever segments differ on the basis of perceived risk dimensions and purchase intention. Design/methodology/approach The data were collected from a survey of 677 customers using a nonprobability sampling technique. A two-step cluster analysis, using hierarchical and nonhierarchical clustering, was conducted on risk-reliever utility scores to segment the customers based on their risk reduction behavior. Furthermore, multivariate discriminant analysis was used to validate the results of cluster analysis. The segments were profiled based on their sociodemographic and behavioral characteristics. Later, one-way analysis of variance was applied to identify differences in the dimensions of perceived risk and purchase intention across clusters. Findings The cluster analysis on the risk-reliever utility scores yielded a classification of customers into four groups − maximum security seekers, minimum security seekers, information seekers and guarantee seekers. Discriminant analysis confirmed the validity of the four-cluster solution. Research limitations/implications This study contributes to the existing literature on risk relievers by augmenting a new perspective of customer segmentation based on their risk reduction behavior. The findings are limited to the cultural context of the study. The researchers are, therefore, encouraged to extend the clustering approach to other developing countries to enhance the generalizability of the results. Practical implications The classification of customers provides better knowledge to the service providers about the preferences of risk relievers by different user segments. It offers valuable insights into the understanding of customers’ risk reduction behavior that will influence marketers to adopt different strategies for each segment to the alleviation of risk perception. Originality/value The originality of the research is its novelty in examining risk reduction as a segmentation variable to guide marketers toward adopting effective risk reduction strategies based on the personality and behavioral characteristics of each user segment.

Journal of Asia Business StudiesVol. 20(1)
Guru Nanak Dev University (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 57%
Customer Service Quality and Loyalty
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.