#YouAreWelcomeHere? The two faces of American higher education toward Chinese international students

Abstract Driven by neoliberal ideology and the enduring social imaginary of the West, international education and degrees from Western universities are often perceived by students and their families as ideal pathways to global citizenship, language acquisition, and enhanced employability. However, despite these presumed benefits, U.S. universities frequently implement homogenizing institutional practices that marginalize Chinese students within the very spaces that claim to empower them. The study adopts Derrida’s hos(ti)pitality (a blend of hospitality and hostility) to expose how U.S. institutions simultaneously welcome and exclude Chinese students. It identifies three dominant institutional orientations: one-way cultural socialization that privileges White, middle-class norms; deficit and culturalist ideologies that pathologize Chinese students, and institutional indifference towards their safety and psychological well-being. Grounded in a critical, equity-oriented perspective, this study employs interactional ethnography to examine how institutional structures and discourses influence the experiences of Chinese students in U.S. universities. Drawing on my own experiences, affective responses, and interactions with fellow Chinese students, I illuminate how racialized exclusions are embedded in both structural forces and everyday micro-level interactions. Rather than viewing contradictions between inclusive rhetoric and marginalizing practices as institutional inconsistencies, I argue these dynamics work in tandem to uphold the neoliberal edu-business model and sustain White/Western supremacy. Ultimately, this study reveals how U.S. higher education’s market-driven logic and colorblind multiculturalism render Chinese students hyper-visible as financial assets yet invisible in discussions about racial equity, underscoring the urgent need for anti-racist institutional accountability in internationalization efforts.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Asia Pacific Education Review
Published
2025-11-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-025-10097-4
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Higher Education Governance and Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
25.57
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

#YouAreWelcomeHere? The two faces of American higher education toward Chinese international students

Jing Yu
3 citations
Asia Pacific Education Review
Higher Education Governance and Development
25.57
article

#YouAreWelcomeHere? The two faces of American higher education toward Chinese international students

Jing Yu
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Abstract Driven by neoliberal ideology and the enduring social imaginary of the West, international education and degrees from Western universities are often perceived by students and their families as ideal pathways to global citizenship, language acquisition, and enhanced employability. However, despite these presumed benefits, U.S. universities frequently implement homogenizing institutional practices that marginalize Chinese students within the very spaces that claim to empower them. The study adopts Derrida’s hos(ti)pitality (a blend of hospitality and hostility) to expose how U.S. institutions simultaneously welcome and exclude Chinese students. It identifies three dominant institutional orientations: one-way cultural socialization that privileges White, middle-class norms; deficit and culturalist ideologies that pathologize Chinese students, and institutional indifference towards their safety and psychological well-being. Grounded in a critical, equity-oriented perspective, this study employs interactional ethnography to examine how institutional structures and discourses influence the experiences of Chinese students in U.S. universities. Drawing on my own experiences, affective responses, and interactions with fellow Chinese students, I illuminate how racialized exclusions are embedded in both structural forces and everyday micro-level interactions. Rather than viewing contradictions between inclusive rhetoric and marginalizing practices as institutional inconsistencies, I argue these dynamics work in tandem to uphold the neoliberal edu-business model and sustain White/Western supremacy. Ultimately, this study reveals how U.S. higher education’s market-driven logic and colorblind multiculturalism render Chinese students hyper-visible as financial assets yet invisible in discussions about racial equity, underscoring the urgent need for anti-racist institutional accountability in internationalization efforts.

Asia Pacific Education Review
University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Higher Education Governance and Development
25.57
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

#YouAreWelcomeHere? The two faces of American higher education toward Chinese international students — Jing Yu · Asia Pacific Education Review (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS