Politics of Sub-regionalism and China’s influence in South Asia: Analyzing India’s Policy Options

The desire to avoid Pakistan in regional forums and pursue the Act East Policy (AEP) has been the driving force behind India’s bend toward sub-regionalism. Bay of Bengal Initiative for Multi-Sectoral Technical and Economic Cooperation and Bangladesh–Bhutan–India–Nepal underscore the idea of a positive-sum game through their intensification of trade and economic networks. Although the same holds true for BCIM, the presence of China and its claims over certain parts of India’s northeastern region have made New Delhi circumspect about its payoffs and dividends. Moreover, the geopolitical ramifications of Beijing’s Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) have exacerbated the fear of Chinese dominance of South Asia in Indian diplomacy. With an endeavor to counter China’s ascendancy in the region, alongside toeing a path of beneficial bilateralism, India has provided unilateral concessions and humanitarian aid to the weaker economies of South Asia. On the other hand, India’s approach toward Beijing has always been cautious and measured. Despite engaging in bilateral trade, protecting its territorial sovereignty against possible Chinese incursions has been prioritized by New Delhi. Hence, the article argues that India remains a significant player in South Asia. Pragmatism and maintaining its strategic autonomy remain the cornerstones of its diplomacy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Jadavpur Journal of International Relations
Published
2025-11-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/09735984251395624
Primary Topic
South Asian Studies and Conflicts
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Politics of Sub-regionalism and China’s influence in South Asia: Analyzing India’s Policy Options

Avipsu Halder
Jadavpur Journal of International Relations
South Asian Studies and Conflicts
article

Politics of Sub-regionalism and China’s influence in South Asia: Analyzing India’s Policy Options

Avipsu Halder
article en

Abstract

The desire to avoid Pakistan in regional forums and pursue the Act East Policy (AEP) has been the driving force behind India’s bend toward sub-regionalism. Bay of Bengal Initiative for Multi-Sectoral Technical and Economic Cooperation and Bangladesh–Bhutan–India–Nepal underscore the idea of a positive-sum game through their intensification of trade and economic networks. Although the same holds true for BCIM, the presence of China and its claims over certain parts of India’s northeastern region have made New Delhi circumspect about its payoffs and dividends. Moreover, the geopolitical ramifications of Beijing’s Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) have exacerbated the fear of Chinese dominance of South Asia in Indian diplomacy. With an endeavor to counter China’s ascendancy in the region, alongside toeing a path of beneficial bilateralism, India has provided unilateral concessions and humanitarian aid to the weaker economies of South Asia. On the other hand, India’s approach toward Beijing has always been cautious and measured. Despite engaging in bilateral trade, protecting its territorial sovereignty against possible Chinese incursions has been prioritized by New Delhi. Hence, the article argues that India remains a significant player in South Asia. Pragmatism and maintaining its strategic autonomy remain the cornerstones of its diplomacy.

Jadavpur Journal of International RelationsVol. 29(2)
University of Calcutta (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 60%
South Asian Studies and Conflicts
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.