Linking microscopy to predictive coating performance via machine learning

Abstract Electron microscopy (EM) and machine learning are progressively utilized to quantify coating characteristics and performance by correlating micrographs and other features with models. Recent studies cover separate techniques, but a few integrate imaging, algorithms, and engineering targets by synthesis. Here, we examine how EM produces high-resolution images of morphology, interfaces, and defects, and how learning approaches convert these images into descriptors and models. We compare learning strategies, including unsupervised and classical image processing, deep learning with U Net for coating phase and pore segmentation, label-efficient EM methods, and tree-based models in predicting tribological response. This review also recommends using benchmark datasets with complete metadata, cross-lab validation, and hybrid training accompanied by expert evaluation. Looking forward, the goal is to guide researchers in developing predictive and prescriptive processes that accelerate coating formulation and processing. Graphical abstract

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
MRS Communications
Published
2025-11-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1557/s43579-025-00886-8
Primary Topic
Corrosion Behavior and Inhibition
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Linking microscopy to predictive coating performance via machine learning

Reymark D. Maalihan, Marcel Roy B. Domalanta, Eugene B. Caldona, Jan Vincent M. Madayag
MRS Communications
Corrosion Behavior and Inhibition
article

Linking microscopy to predictive coating performance via machine learning

Reymark D. Maalihan, Marcel Roy B. Domalanta, Eugene B. Caldona, Jan Vincent M. Madayag
article en

Abstract

Abstract Electron microscopy (EM) and machine learning are progressively utilized to quantify coating characteristics and performance by correlating micrographs and other features with models. Recent studies cover separate techniques, but a few integrate imaging, algorithms, and engineering targets by synthesis. Here, we examine how EM produces high-resolution images of morphology, interfaces, and defects, and how learning approaches convert these images into descriptors and models. We compare learning strategies, including unsupervised and classical image processing, deep learning with U Net for coating phase and pore segmentation, label-efficient EM methods, and tree-based models in predicting tribological response. This review also recommends using benchmark datasets with complete metadata, cross-lab validation, and hybrid training accompanied by expert evaluation. Looking forward, the goal is to guide researchers in developing predictive and prescriptive processes that accelerate coating formulation and processing. Graphical abstract

MRS CommunicationsVol. 16(1)
North Dakota State University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 71%
Corrosion Behavior and Inhibition
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.