Digital health literacy: Hepatitis B information quality on internet platforms

Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the quality, accuracy, and reliability of internet-based information on Hepatitis B. Withincreasing public reliance on online sources for health information, ensuring the accuracy and trustworthiness of this content is crucial.Using standardized tools such as the DISCERN instrument and JAMA Benchmark Criteria, the study sought to assess online contentand identify reliable sources related to Hepatitis B, ultimately contributing to the promotion of digital health literacy.Materials and Methods: The keywords “Hepatitis B” and “Hepatitis B disease” were searched on Google and Yandex. The first10 result pages from each search engine were screened, yielding 190 websites. After excluding duplicates and irrelevant pages, 92websites were evaluated. Each was assessed using the DISCERN tool and JAMA Benchmark Criteria. Readability scores were alsocalculated using a standard readability formula.Results: Of the 92 evaluated websites, 48 (52.17%) were from private hospitals, 13 (14.13%) from private individuals, and 9 (9.78%)from private laboratories. DISCERN evaluations showed that none of the websites were of high or medium quality. According toJAMA, 7 sites scored high (3 points), and 34 scored medium (2 points). The average readability score was 63.8±8.5, indicatingmoderately easy-to-read content. However, most sites lacked comprehensive and referenced information.Conclusion: The findings reveal that the majority of online content about Hepatitis B is of low quality and reliability. This underscoresthe need for improved digital content standards and highlights the importance of directing users toward verified, high-quality healthinformation sources.