Exploring the role of cash-based interventions in alleviating food insecurity among the forcibly displaced: the case of Rohingya refugees, Bangladesh

Food insecurity remains a critical determinant of health, disproportionately affecting displaced populations. Individuals forced to flee due to conflict, disasters, or economic hardship face increased challenges in accessing food, a situation worsened by COVID-19-related disruptions in food supply and relief efforts. This study examines how cash incentives mitigate food insecurity among forcibly displaced Rohingya communities in Bangladesh's Cox's Bazar district, utilizing data from the 2020-2021 Cox's Bazar high-frequency survey. Data were collected among 5020 participants. We employed bivariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses to identify factors associated with food insecurity. Results from the multivariate model highlight that households receiving cash incentives had significantly lower odds of experiencing food insecurity (OR = 0.19, CI = 0.09-0.38), even after adjusting for demographic and socioeconomic factors. Additionally, females (OR = 3.44, CI = 1.41-5.36), the unemployed (OR = 3.45, CI = 2.67-6.13), individuals with declining incomes (OR = 1.46, CI = 1.39-5.44), and larger households (those with more than five members) (OR = 1.89, CI = 1.35-4.47) were found to be at significantly higher risk of food insecurity. Based on these findings, we recommend that targeted cash transfer programs be institutionalized within broader national food security strategies. These programs should prioritize high-risk groups, such as unemployed individuals, female-headed households, and large families, and be integrated with employment initiatives and income support mechanisms. Furthermore, addressing social determinants such as housing and healthcare, alongside economic support, will contribute to more sustainable food security. Linking cash assistance with economic resilience strategies such as wage subsidies, social protection schemes, and vocational training can help reduce dependency on temporary relief and empower displaced populations toward long-term stability.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Conflict and Health
Published
2025-11-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13031-025-00714-9
Primary Topic
Food Security and Health in Diverse Populations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Exploring the role of cash-based interventions in alleviating food insecurity among the forcibly displaced: the case of Rohingya refugees, Bangladesh

Meshack Achore, Eugene Osei Yeboah, P. Mbaya, Thelma Abu Zulfaw
Conflict and Health
Food Security and Health in Diverse Populations
article

Exploring the role of cash-based interventions in alleviating food insecurity among the forcibly displaced: the case of Rohingya refugees, Bangladesh

Meshack Achore, Eugene Osei Yeboah, P. Mbaya, Thelma Abu Zulfaw
article en

Abstract

Food insecurity remains a critical determinant of health, disproportionately affecting displaced populations. Individuals forced to flee due to conflict, disasters, or economic hardship face increased challenges in accessing food, a situation worsened by COVID-19-related disruptions in food supply and relief efforts. This study examines how cash incentives mitigate food insecurity among forcibly displaced Rohingya communities in Bangladesh's Cox's Bazar district, utilizing data from the 2020-2021 Cox's Bazar high-frequency survey. Data were collected among 5020 participants. We employed bivariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses to identify factors associated with food insecurity. Results from the multivariate model highlight that households receiving cash incentives had significantly lower odds of experiencing food insecurity (OR = 0.19, CI = 0.09-0.38), even after adjusting for demographic and socioeconomic factors. Additionally, females (OR = 3.44, CI = 1.41-5.36), the unemployed (OR = 3.45, CI = 2.67-6.13), individuals with declining incomes (OR = 1.46, CI = 1.39-5.44), and larger households (those with more than five members) (OR = 1.89, CI = 1.35-4.47) were found to be at significantly higher risk of food insecurity. Based on these findings, we recommend that targeted cash transfer programs be institutionalized within broader national food security strategies. These programs should prioritize high-risk groups, such as unemployed individuals, female-headed households, and large families, and be integrated with employment initiatives and income support mechanisms. Furthermore, addressing social determinants such as housing and healthcare, alongside economic support, will contribute to more sustainable food security. Linking cash assistance with economic resilience strategies such as wage subsidies, social protection schemes, and vocational training can help reduce dependency on temporary relief and empower displaced populations toward long-term stability.

Conflict and HealthVol. 19(1)
University of Vermont (US), Hofstra University (US), University of Connecticut (US), Ghana Health Service (GH)
Openalex Percentile: Top 47%
Food Security and Health in Diverse Populations
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.