Multitasking Tug-of-War: Exploring the Impact of Task Modality, Task Load Level, and Task Load Type on Dual-Task Interference in Virtual Reality

ObjectiveThe present work investigates how task modality (visual, auditory), task load level (low or high), and task load type (target-distractor similarity, display rate) influence dual-task interference in virtual reality (VR).BackgroundDual-task interference is influenced by various factors including perceptual modality, where tasks that share the same modality may yield larger performance decrements than tasks that do not. Task load (i.e., level and type) can also reduce performance in one or both tasks. However, the interaction between these factors in immersive environments like VR is still unclear.MethodParticipants performed a: (a) visual tracking task, (b) visual/auditory detection task, or (c) both concurrently in two different experiments. In Experiment 1, visual tracking load was manipulated via increasing target-distractor similarity, while detection load was manipulated via increasing display rate. In Experiment 2, detection load was manipulated by increasing target-distractor similarity.ResultsIn Experiment 1, higher detection task loads induced greater dual-task costs (DTC) in the detection task regardless of task modality, whereas tracking task DTC was not influenced by higher task loads. In Experiment 2, higher detection task loads induced greater DTC in the detection task only when it was presented visually.ConclusionThe findings suggest that tasks presented in the same modality may experience greater dual-task interference in one or both tasks depending on the task load level and type.ApplicationThese findings can inform the design of multimodal interfaces in complex multitasking environments like military operations or emergency response where minimizing dual-task interference at varying workloads is crucial.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Human Factors The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society
Published
2025-11-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/00187208251396766
Primary Topic
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Multitasking Tug-of-War: Exploring the Impact of Task Modality, Task Load Level, and Task Load Type on Dual-Task Interference in Virtual Reality

Matthew L. Bolton, Mohamad El Iskandarani, Sara L. Riggs
Human Factors The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
article

Multitasking Tug-of-War: Exploring the Impact of Task Modality, Task Load Level, and Task Load Type on Dual-Task Interference in Virtual Reality

Matthew L. Bolton, Mohamad El Iskandarani, Sara L. Riggs
article en

Abstract

ObjectiveThe present work investigates how task modality (visual, auditory), task load level (low or high), and task load type (target-distractor similarity, display rate) influence dual-task interference in virtual reality (VR).BackgroundDual-task interference is influenced by various factors including perceptual modality, where tasks that share the same modality may yield larger performance decrements than tasks that do not. Task load (i.e., level and type) can also reduce performance in one or both tasks. However, the interaction between these factors in immersive environments like VR is still unclear.MethodParticipants performed a: (a) visual tracking task, (b) visual/auditory detection task, or (c) both concurrently in two different experiments. In Experiment 1, visual tracking load was manipulated via increasing target-distractor similarity, while detection load was manipulated via increasing display rate. In Experiment 2, detection load was manipulated by increasing target-distractor similarity.ResultsIn Experiment 1, higher detection task loads induced greater dual-task costs (DTC) in the detection task regardless of task modality, whereas tracking task DTC was not influenced by higher task loads. In Experiment 2, higher detection task loads induced greater DTC in the detection task only when it was presented visually.ConclusionThe findings suggest that tasks presented in the same modality may experience greater dual-task interference in one or both tasks depending on the task load level and type.ApplicationThese findings can inform the design of multimodal interfaces in complex multitasking environments like military operations or emergency response where minimizing dual-task interference at varying workloads is crucial.

Human Factors The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics SocietyVol. 68(4)
University of Virginia (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 59%
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Multitasking Tug-of-War: Exploring the Impact of Task Modality, Task Load Level, and Task Load Type on Dual-Task Interference in Virtual Reality — Matthew L. Bolton, Mohamad El Iskandarani, et al. · Human Factors The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS