Phenotypic dominance emerges from activity fitness functions and molecular interactions

Mendelian genetics provides us with a framework for studying allelic dominance relationships at a locus at the phenotypic level. These dominance relationships result from different molecular factors, including the mapping of molecular activity onto fitness. For homomeric proteins, physical interactions between alleles provide a mechanism by which 1 allele can have a dominant effect on the activity of the other. Here, we refer to the effect of these interactions as molecular dominance and examine how they determine total protein activity and contribute to phenotypic dominance. The relative impact of such molecular dominance effects depends on the proportion of subunits that heteromerize relative to those that form homomers. In addition, we show how the effect of physical interactions on phenotypic dominance depends on the function linking protein activity to fitness. Our results show the complex relationships between molecular and phenotypic dominance and highlight the fundamental difference in dominance landscapes for monomeric and homomeric proteins.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Genetics
Published
2025-11-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/genetics/iyaf254
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Genetics and Physical Performance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.63

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Phenotypic dominance emerges from activity fitness functions and molecular interactions

Christian R. Landry, Angel F. Cisneros, Soham Dibyachintan, Tushar Pal
2 citations
Genetics
Genetics and Physical Performance
3.63
article

Phenotypic dominance emerges from activity fitness functions and molecular interactions

Christian R. Landry, Angel F. Cisneros, Soham Dibyachintan, Tushar Pal
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Mendelian genetics provides us with a framework for studying allelic dominance relationships at a locus at the phenotypic level. These dominance relationships result from different molecular factors, including the mapping of molecular activity onto fitness. For homomeric proteins, physical interactions between alleles provide a mechanism by which 1 allele can have a dominant effect on the activity of the other. Here, we refer to the effect of these interactions as molecular dominance and examine how they determine total protein activity and contribute to phenotypic dominance. The relative impact of such molecular dominance effects depends on the proportion of subunits that heteromerize relative to those that form homomers. In addition, we show how the effect of physical interactions on phenotypic dominance depends on the function linking protein activity to fitness. Our results show the complex relationships between molecular and phenotypic dominance and highlight the fundamental difference in dominance landscapes for monomeric and homomeric proteins.

GeneticsVol. 232(2)
Indian Institute of Science Education and Research Kolkata (IN), PROTEO (CA), Université Laval (CA)
Université Laval, Mitacs, Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada, Fonds de recherche du Québec – Nature et technologies
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Genetics and Physical Performance
3.63
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.