Neuro–Pedagogical Alignment: A Theoretical Model for Learning Efficiency

Abstract This paper proposes the Neuro–Pedagogical Alignment Model (NPAM), a meso-level theoretical framework integrating neuroscience and education. Drawing on recent findings in developmental, emotional, and cognitive neuroscience, NPAM explains learning effectiveness as the alignment between neural mechanisms, instructional design, and contextual conditions. The model identifies three core mechanisms—Match, Tuning, and Consolidation—linking prefrontal executive control, emotional regulation, and hippocampal memory processes to task structure, affective safety, and learning rhythm. Through a critical synthesis, the paper challenges the “pseudo-neuralization” of education, the empathic bias of teaching practice, and equity issues arising from neural diversity. NPAM reframes pedagogy from “what works” to “what aligns,” offering biologically feasible, ethically responsible, and practically testable principles for future educational design and research.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Theory and Practice in Humanities and Social Sciences
Published
2025-11-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.70693/itphss.v2i11.1495
Primary Topic
Neuroscience, Education and Cognitive Function
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Neuro–Pedagogical Alignment: A Theoretical Model for Learning Efficiency

Zhaohui Hao, Ha YougHo
International Theory and Practice in Humanities and Social Sciences
Neuroscience, Education and Cognitive Function
article

Neuro–Pedagogical Alignment: A Theoretical Model for Learning Efficiency

Zhaohui Hao, Ha YougHo
article en

Abstract

Abstract This paper proposes the Neuro–Pedagogical Alignment Model (NPAM), a meso-level theoretical framework integrating neuroscience and education. Drawing on recent findings in developmental, emotional, and cognitive neuroscience, NPAM explains learning effectiveness as the alignment between neural mechanisms, instructional design, and contextual conditions. The model identifies three core mechanisms—Match, Tuning, and Consolidation—linking prefrontal executive control, emotional regulation, and hippocampal memory processes to task structure, affective safety, and learning rhythm. Through a critical synthesis, the paper challenges the “pseudo-neuralization” of education, the empathic bias of teaching practice, and equity issues arising from neural diversity. NPAM reframes pedagogy from “what works” to “what aligns,” offering biologically feasible, ethically responsible, and practically testable principles for future educational design and research.

International Theory and Practice in Humanities and Social SciencesVol. 2(11)
Sehan University (KR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 64%
Neuroscience, Education and Cognitive Function
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.