Resilience and Preparedness Across Place: A Multilevel Analysis of Urban–Rural and Socioeconomic Divides

This study investigates how local context-specifically urban versus rural environments and socioeconomic conditions-influences individual crisis preparedness and resilience in Sweden. Using multilevel survey data from 12,574 respondents, we analyze both proactive preparedness actions and perceived resilience. Results show that rural residents report higher levels of preparedness and resilience than their urban counterparts. However, these differences in preparedness attenuate when controlling for individual risk perception, suggesting a mediating role. Socioeconomic context, on the other hand, does not show an independent effect beyond individual characteristics, indicating compositional rather than contextual influences. The findings highlight the importance of tailoring crisis preparedness strategies to both individual and local characteristics and stress the need for authorities to consider spatial disparities in vulnerability when planning for future crises.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Risk Analysis
Published
2025-11-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.70155
Primary Topic
Disaster Management and Resilience
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Resilience and Preparedness Across Place: A Multilevel Analysis of Urban–Rural and Socioeconomic Divides

Susanne Wallman Lundåsen, Ebba Henrekson
Risk Analysis
Disaster Management and Resilience
article

Resilience and Preparedness Across Place: A Multilevel Analysis of Urban–Rural and Socioeconomic Divides

Susanne Wallman Lundåsen, Ebba Henrekson
article en

Abstract

This study investigates how local context-specifically urban versus rural environments and socioeconomic conditions-influences individual crisis preparedness and resilience in Sweden. Using multilevel survey data from 12,574 respondents, we analyze both proactive preparedness actions and perceived resilience. Results show that rural residents report higher levels of preparedness and resilience than their urban counterparts. However, these differences in preparedness attenuate when controlling for individual risk perception, suggesting a mediating role. Socioeconomic context, on the other hand, does not show an independent effect beyond individual characteristics, indicating compositional rather than contextual influences. The findings highlight the importance of tailoring crisis preparedness strategies to both individual and local characteristics and stress the need for authorities to consider spatial disparities in vulnerability when planning for future crises.

Risk AnalysisVol. 45(12)
Linköping University (SE), Stockholm School of Economics (SE), Marie Cederschiöld University (SE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 55%
Disaster Management and Resilience
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Resilience and Preparedness Across Place: A Multilevel Analysis of Urban–Rural and Socioeconomic Divides — Susanne Wallman Lundåsen, Ebba Henrekson · Risk Analysis (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS