Measuring Human Noise Sensitivity: Psychometric Evaluation in an Online Survey

Human noise-sensitivity has been measured by various instruments.These have rarely been compared, and, if so, with limited sample sizes.Therefore, the present study administered all major noise-sensitivity instruments simultaneously and in the same participant sample.An online survey was conducted and distributed via Prolific, recruiting 311 British participants (sample representative with respect to age, sex and ethnicity).The 21-item Weinstein Noise-Sensitivity Scale (WNSS), the 52-item Individual Noise-Sensitivity Questionnaire (LEF), and the 35-item Noise-Sensitivity Questionnaire (NoiSeQ) were presented in random order along with two types of singleitem ratings of noise sensitivity.Additionally, retrospective annoyance ratings with respect to six specific noise-sources, the Hyperacusis Impact Questionnaire (HIQ), and the Severity of Symptoms of Sound Sensitivity Questionnaire (SSSQ) were included.Results show high internal consistency (all Cronbach's alpha > .90)for the three noisesensitivity questionnaires and strong inter-correlations (all r > .83) of their overall scores.As expected, correlations with annoyance are lower, showing remarkable differences depending on the noise source in question.In all, the present findings provide support for the excellent psychometric quality of the established noise-sensitivity questionnaires, and confirm noise sensitivity as a

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-12-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.61782/fa.2025.0555
Primary Topic
Noise Effects and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Measuring Human Noise Sensitivity: Psychometric Evaluation in an Online Survey

Eunsung Song, Karin Zimmer, Catherine Marquis-Favre, Wolfgang Ellermeier et al.
Noise Effects and Management
article

Measuring Human Noise Sensitivity: Psychometric Evaluation in an Online Survey

Eunsung Song, Karin Zimmer, Catherine Marquis-Favre, Wolfgang Ellermeier, Sang Cheol Park, Romane Strebel
article en

Abstract

Human noise-sensitivity has been measured by various instruments.These have rarely been compared, and, if so, with limited sample sizes.Therefore, the present study administered all major noise-sensitivity instruments simultaneously and in the same participant sample.An online survey was conducted and distributed via Prolific, recruiting 311 British participants (sample representative with respect to age, sex and ethnicity).The 21-item Weinstein Noise-Sensitivity Scale (WNSS), the 52-item Individual Noise-Sensitivity Questionnaire (LEF), and the 35-item Noise-Sensitivity Questionnaire (NoiSeQ) were presented in random order along with two types of singleitem ratings of noise sensitivity.Additionally, retrospective annoyance ratings with respect to six specific noise-sources, the Hyperacusis Impact Questionnaire (HIQ), and the Severity of Symptoms of Sound Sensitivity Questionnaire (SSSQ) were included.Results show high internal consistency (all Cronbach's alpha > .90)for the three noisesensitivity questionnaires and strong inter-correlations (all r > .83) of their overall scores.As expected, correlations with annoyance are lower, showing remarkable differences depending on the noise source in question.In all, the present findings provide support for the excellent psychometric quality of the established noise-sensitivity questionnaires, and confirm noise sensitivity as a

University of Vechta (DE), Korea Institute of Civil Engineering and Building Technology (KR), Technische Universität Darmstadt (DE), Laboratoire de Tribologie et Dynamique des Systèmes (FR), École Nationale des Travaux Publics de l'État (FR), Centre Lyonnais d'Acoustique
Fondation Pour l'Audition, Agence Nationale de la Recherche, Centre Lyonnais d'Acoustique, Université de Lyon
Openalex Percentile: Top 54%
Noise Effects and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.