Uncertainty quantification and reliability assessment for intermodal freight transportation

• Transportation cost is the main driver of system performance under uncertainty • Truck-based routes remain optimal even when facility disruptions are introduced • Infrastructure disruptions alone do not shift transport modes in low-volume cases • High fuel costs are consistently linked to poor freight system performance • The study offers a framework to assess risk and resilience in freight planning Intermodal freight optimization models support cost-effective, low-emission, and timely goods movement by coordinating trucks, rail, and barges. These models determine optimal flows, routing, and modal switches while respecting infrastructure and operational constraints. However, their real-world utility is often undermined by pervasive uncertainties-such as fluctuating transportation costs and emissions, variable terminal capacities, and uncertain freight demand-that distort key performance outcomes, including total system cost, carbon footprint, and transit time reliability. This study presents a structured framework for quantifying uncertainty in intermodal freight transportation (IFT) optimization. The framework evaluates how input uncertainty affects system performance and reliability, a critical need for ensuring that model-based decisions remain robust under real-world variability, especially amid volatile fuel prices, shifting demand, and growing disruptions. It integrates three complementary methods: (1) Sobol-based global sensitivity analysis to identify influential parameters affecting cost, emissions, and transit time, (2) Monte Carlo-based capacity perturbation analysis to assess robustness under probabilistic facility disruptions, and (3) Monte Carlo filtering with Bayesian inference to detect threshold-based performance vulnerabilities. The results highlight diesel truck unit cost as the dominant driver of variability. To improve system resilience, planners should prioritize uncertainty in fuel-related parameters when designing intermodal strategies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Reliability Engineering & System Safety
Published
2025-11-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2025.111996
Primary Topic
Infrastructure Resilience and Vulnerability Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Uncertainty quantification and reliability assessment for intermodal freight transportation

Craig Philip, Paul Johnson, Ahmad F. Taha, Hiba Baroud et al.
Reliability Engineering & System Safety
Infrastructure Resilience and Vulnerability Analysis
article

Uncertainty quantification and reliability assessment for intermodal freight transportation

Craig Philip, Paul Johnson, Ahmad F. Taha, Hiba Baroud, Sankaran Mahadevan, Jafar Mandouri
article en

Abstract

• Transportation cost is the main driver of system performance under uncertainty • Truck-based routes remain optimal even when facility disruptions are introduced • Infrastructure disruptions alone do not shift transport modes in low-volume cases • High fuel costs are consistently linked to poor freight system performance • The study offers a framework to assess risk and resilience in freight planning Intermodal freight optimization models support cost-effective, low-emission, and timely goods movement by coordinating trucks, rail, and barges. These models determine optimal flows, routing, and modal switches while respecting infrastructure and operational constraints. However, their real-world utility is often undermined by pervasive uncertainties-such as fluctuating transportation costs and emissions, variable terminal capacities, and uncertain freight demand-that distort key performance outcomes, including total system cost, carbon footprint, and transit time reliability. This study presents a structured framework for quantifying uncertainty in intermodal freight transportation (IFT) optimization. The framework evaluates how input uncertainty affects system performance and reliability, a critical need for ensuring that model-based decisions remain robust under real-world variability, especially amid volatile fuel prices, shifting demand, and growing disruptions. It integrates three complementary methods: (1) Sobol-based global sensitivity analysis to identify influential parameters affecting cost, emissions, and transit time, (2) Monte Carlo-based capacity perturbation analysis to assess robustness under probabilistic facility disruptions, and (3) Monte Carlo filtering with Bayesian inference to detect threshold-based performance vulnerabilities. The results highlight diesel truck unit cost as the dominant driver of variability. To improve system resilience, planners should prioritize uncertainty in fuel-related parameters when designing intermodal strategies.

Reliability Engineering & System SafetyVol. 268
Vanderbilt University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 63%
Infrastructure Resilience and Vulnerability Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.