Counting Subgraphs under Shuffle Differential Privacy

To understand the complex structures and relationships in graph data while safeguarding personal privacy, subgraph counting under differential privacy (DP) has received a lot of attention recently. The problem is particularly important in a distributed setting, where each node holds only its local neighboring information and the analyst is untrusted. In the literature, two DP models are tailored for this scenario, known as local DP and shuffle DP, whereas the latter is equipped with a trusted shuffler that random shuffles the messages before handing them to the analyst. Since the shuffler introduces no additional privacy risk, any local DP protocol automatically satisfies shuffle DP, and the key question is whether shuffle DP can offer any improvement, especially for utility. While positive results have been obtained for a number of basic problems, such as basic counting, frequency estimation, and distinct count, it still remains elusive if this is the case for any graph problem. In this paper, we advance the understanding of this question by presenting new shuffle DP protocols for counting various subgraphs, including triangles, 4-cycles, and 3-hop paths, which improve upon the existing local DP and shuffle DP protocols, both asymptotically and concretely.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-11-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1145/3719027.3765047
Primary Topic
Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Counting Subgraphs under Shuffle Differential Privacy

Juanru Fang, Ke Yi
Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
article

Counting Subgraphs under Shuffle Differential Privacy

Juanru Fang, Ke Yi
article en

Abstract

To understand the complex structures and relationships in graph data while safeguarding personal privacy, subgraph counting under differential privacy (DP) has received a lot of attention recently. The problem is particularly important in a distributed setting, where each node holds only its local neighboring information and the analyst is untrusted. In the literature, two DP models are tailored for this scenario, known as local DP and shuffle DP, whereas the latter is equipped with a trusted shuffler that random shuffles the messages before handing them to the analyst. Since the shuffler introduces no additional privacy risk, any local DP protocol automatically satisfies shuffle DP, and the key question is whether shuffle DP can offer any improvement, especially for utility. While positive results have been obtained for a number of basic problems, such as basic counting, frequency estimation, and distinct count, it still remains elusive if this is the case for any graph problem. In this paper, we advance the understanding of this question by presenting new shuffle DP protocols for counting various subgraphs, including triangles, 4-cycles, and 3-hop paths, which improve upon the existing local DP and shuffle DP protocols, both asymptotically and concretely.

Chinese University of Hong Kong (HK), Hong Kong University of Science and Technology (HK), University of Hong Kong (HK)
Openalex Percentile: Top 81%
Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.