The Phantom Menace in Crypto-Based PET-Hardened Deep Learning Models: Invisible Configuration-Induced Attacks

The increasing use of deep learning (DL) models has given rise to significant privacy concerns regarding training and inference data. To address these concerns, the community has increasingly adopted crypto-based privacy-enhancing technologies (CPET) like homomorphic encryption (HE), secure multi-party computation (MPC), and zero-knowledge proofs (ZKP). The integration of CPET with DL, often referred to as CPET-DL, is commonly facilitated by specialized frameworks like CrypTen, TenSEAL, and EZKL. These frameworks offer configurable parameters to balance model accuracy and computational efficiency during privacy-preserving operations. However, these configurations, while seemingly harmless, can introduce subtle vulnerabilities. The stealthy attacks induced by misconfigurations are hard to detect because 1) the plaintext models remain vulnerability-free, and 2) existing auditing tools are hardly applicable to CPET-hardened models. This creates a paradox: tools intended to protect privacy can be undermined through configuration manipulation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-11-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1145/3719027.3765107
Primary Topic
Cryptography and Data Security
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Phantom Menace in Crypto-Based PET-Hardened Deep Learning Models: Invisible Configuration-Induced Attacks

Juergen Rahmel, Daoyuan Wu, Zhibo Liu, Dongwei Xiao et al.
Cryptography and Data Security
article

The Phantom Menace in Crypto-Based PET-Hardened Deep Learning Models: Invisible Configuration-Induced Attacks

Juergen Rahmel, Daoyuan Wu, Zhibo Liu, Dongwei Xiao, Zhenlan Ji, Shuai Wang, Yiteng Peng
article en

Abstract

The increasing use of deep learning (DL) models has given rise to significant privacy concerns regarding training and inference data. To address these concerns, the community has increasingly adopted crypto-based privacy-enhancing technologies (CPET) like homomorphic encryption (HE), secure multi-party computation (MPC), and zero-knowledge proofs (ZKP). The integration of CPET with DL, often referred to as CPET-DL, is commonly facilitated by specialized frameworks like CrypTen, TenSEAL, and EZKL. These frameworks offer configurable parameters to balance model accuracy and computational efficiency during privacy-preserving operations. However, these configurations, while seemingly harmless, can introduce subtle vulnerabilities. The stealthy attacks induced by misconfigurations are hard to detect because 1) the plaintext models remain vulnerability-free, and 2) existing auditing tools are hardly applicable to CPET-hardened models. This creates a paradox: tools intended to protect privacy can be undermined through configuration manipulation.

Hong Kong University of Science and Technology (HK), HSBC Holdings (GB)
HSBC Bank USA, Hong Kong University of Science and Technology
Openalex Percentile: Top 81%
Cryptography and Data Security
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The Phantom Menace in Crypto-Based PET-Hardened Deep Learning Models: Invisible Configuration-Induced Attacks — Juergen Rahmel, Daoyuan Wu, et al. · (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS