Comparative mechanical performance evaluation of recycled brick aggregate concrete and natural aggregate concrete

The global increase in construction and demolition (C&D) waste due to natural disasters and urban redevelopment presents a significant environmental challenge. This study evaluates the mechanical performance of reinforced concrete (RC) beams incorporating recycled brick aggregates (RBA) as a sustainable alternative to natural aggregates (NA). Four concrete mixes were tested: 100 % NA, 100 % RBA, and two hybrid combinations of fine and coarse aggregates. RC beams were subjected to four-point bending tests, and companion cylindrical and prismatic specimens were tested for compressive strength and modulus of rupture (MOR). Results indicate that RC beams made with RBA can achieve shear capacities comparable to those made with NA. While beams incorporating coarse brick aggregates showed a more pronounced reduction in shear strength, with values dropping to 53.0 kN, the highest shear strength (71 kN) was observed in mixes using brick fine aggregates and natural coarse aggregates, nearly matching the 70.8 kN of the 100 % NA mix. However, 100 % RBA mixes exhibited a 24 % reduction in compressive strength and a 16 % reduction in MOR compared to NA mixes. Despite these reductions, the structural behavior and failure modes remained consistent across all compositions. From a sustainability perspective, the use of RBA offers a dual benefit: reducing the demand for virgin aggregates and diverting substantial volumes of brick waste from landfills. In regions where C&D waste constitutes a significant portion of total solid waste, adopting RBA concrete could conserve millions of tons of natural resources annually. This study demonstrates the feasibility of using 100 % recycled brick aggregates in structural concrete, supporting a circular economy approach in the construction sector. • RC beams with recycled brick aggregates show comparable shear performance. • 100 % RBA concrete showed 24 % lower compressive strength than NA concrete. • Shear strength of 100 % RBA beams reached 71 kN, close to 70.8 kN of NA beams. • Structural failure modes remain consistent across all aggregate compositions. • Recycled brick use supports circular economy and resource conservation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Building Engineering
Published
2025-11-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2025.114702
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Recycled Aggregate Concrete Performance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.01
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative mechanical performance evaluation of recycled brick aggregate concrete and natural aggregate concrete

Marco Vocciante, Laura Cirrincione, Muhammad Yousaf, Muhammad Shajih Zafar et al.
2 citations
Journal of Building Engineering
Recycled Aggregate Concrete Performance
2.01
article

Comparative mechanical performance evaluation of recycled brick aggregate concrete and natural aggregate concrete

Marco Vocciante, Laura Cirrincione, Muhammad Yousaf, Muhammad Shajih Zafar, Muhammad Rizwan Nazir
article en
2 citations

Abstract

The global increase in construction and demolition (C&D) waste due to natural disasters and urban redevelopment presents a significant environmental challenge. This study evaluates the mechanical performance of reinforced concrete (RC) beams incorporating recycled brick aggregates (RBA) as a sustainable alternative to natural aggregates (NA). Four concrete mixes were tested: 100 % NA, 100 % RBA, and two hybrid combinations of fine and coarse aggregates. RC beams were subjected to four-point bending tests, and companion cylindrical and prismatic specimens were tested for compressive strength and modulus of rupture (MOR). Results indicate that RC beams made with RBA can achieve shear capacities comparable to those made with NA. While beams incorporating coarse brick aggregates showed a more pronounced reduction in shear strength, with values dropping to 53.0 kN, the highest shear strength (71 kN) was observed in mixes using brick fine aggregates and natural coarse aggregates, nearly matching the 70.8 kN of the 100 % NA mix. However, 100 % RBA mixes exhibited a 24 % reduction in compressive strength and a 16 % reduction in MOR compared to NA mixes. Despite these reductions, the structural behavior and failure modes remained consistent across all compositions. From a sustainability perspective, the use of RBA offers a dual benefit: reducing the demand for virgin aggregates and diverting substantial volumes of brick waste from landfills. In regions where C&D waste constitutes a significant portion of total solid waste, adopting RBA concrete could conserve millions of tons of natural resources annually. This study demonstrates the feasibility of using 100 % recycled brick aggregates in structural concrete, supporting a circular economy approach in the construction sector. • RC beams with recycled brick aggregates show comparable shear performance. • 100 % RBA concrete showed 24 % lower compressive strength than NA concrete. • Shear strength of 100 % RBA beams reached 71 kN, close to 70.8 kN of NA beams. • Structural failure modes remain consistent across all aggregate compositions. • Recycled brick use supports circular economy and resource conservation.

Journal of Building EngineeringVol. 116
Åbo Akademi University (FI), University of Engineering and Technology Lahore (PK), University of Genoa (IT), University of Palermo (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Recycled Aggregate Concrete Performance
2.01
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.