Correction to “Bioinspired Hydrophilic and Oleophilic Absorption Media from Biotemplated Fungi”

The units for the Reduced Modulus and Hardness on Figures 8 and9, respectively, were erroneously listed as MPa rather than GPa.This error does not affect the body of the text or the conclusions.In section 3.3.Mechanical Properties, values were discussed in relation to each other (e.g., "The hybrid samples achieved an average reduced modulus of more than 337 times larger and an average hardness of more than 172 times larger than the respective averages of the monomitic dehydrated samples."),which remains true for the values with the correct units.Additional discussion is found in section 3.4.Liquid Absorption Properties, comparing the absorption and mechanical properties of sol-gel materials to those fabricated in this study.In this section, it is stated, "While some of these sol-gel materials may be able to absorb more fluid, they have less mechanical resistance than what was achieved in this study."Because the error used MPa rather than GPa, this discussion point is still true and not affected by the error.We apologize for this error.Figure 8.Figure 9.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Advanced Engineering Materials
Published
2025-11-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/adem.70350
Primary Topic
Nanocomposite Films for Food Packaging
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Correction to “Bioinspired Hydrophilic and Oleophilic Absorption Media from Biotemplated Fungi”

Krista Carlson, Hammad Malik, Casey Elliott, Debora Lyn Porter et al.
Advanced Engineering Materials
Nanocomposite Films for Food Packaging
article

Correction to “Bioinspired Hydrophilic and Oleophilic Absorption Media from Biotemplated Fungi”

Krista Carlson, Hammad Malik, Casey Elliott, Debora Lyn Porter, Steven E. Naleway
article en

Abstract

The units for the Reduced Modulus and Hardness on Figures 8 and9, respectively, were erroneously listed as MPa rather than GPa.This error does not affect the body of the text or the conclusions.In section 3.3.Mechanical Properties, values were discussed in relation to each other (e.g., "The hybrid samples achieved an average reduced modulus of more than 337 times larger and an average hardness of more than 172 times larger than the respective averages of the monomitic dehydrated samples."),which remains true for the values with the correct units.Additional discussion is found in section 3.4.Liquid Absorption Properties, comparing the absorption and mechanical properties of sol-gel materials to those fabricated in this study.In this section, it is stated, "While some of these sol-gel materials may be able to absorb more fluid, they have less mechanical resistance than what was achieved in this study."Because the error used MPa rather than GPa, this discussion point is still true and not affected by the error.We apologize for this error.Figure 8.Figure 9.

Advanced Engineering MaterialsVol. 28(1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 76%
Nanocomposite Films for Food Packaging
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Correction to “Bioinspired Hydrophilic and Oleophilic Absorption Media from Biotemplated Fungi” — Krista Carlson, Hammad Malik, et al. · Advanced Engineering Materials (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS