Forage mass and botanical composition of four annual forages grown in a loblolly pine silvopasture in the Mid‐South USA

Abstract Annual forages are commonly planted in open pasture in the Mid‐South, but there is little information on the productivity of these forages when incorporated into silvopasture. The objective was to evaluate four annual forages adapted to the Mid‐South, namely, arrowleaf clover ( Trifolium vesiculosum Savi), crimson clover ( Trifolium incarnatum L.), tetraploid annual ryegrass ( Lolium multiflorum L.), and diploid annual ryegrass ( Lolium multiflorum L.), in a loblolly pine ( Pinus taeda L.) silvopasture for seasonal forage mass distribution and annual forage accumulation. The forages were tested in a randomized complete block design with three replicates and three harvests per year: Harvest 1 (H1, April), Harvest 2 (H2, May), and Harvest 3 (H3, July) from 2020 to 2022. Both annual ryegrass types had greater forage mass for H1 and H2, with minimal regrowth after H2 and low forage mass for H3. Both annual ryegrass types outperformed the legumes, which largely failed to establish in this environment, contributing <22% of forage mass across harvests despite adequate soil pH, seed bed preparation, and inoculation. Both annual ryegrass types had greater forage mass in the loblolly silvopasture system for H1 and H2 and are more suitable forages for the system than the legumes tested.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Crop Forage & Turfgrass Management
Published
2025-11-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/cft2.70089
Primary Topic
Agroforestry and silvopastoral systems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Forage mass and botanical composition of four annual forages grown in a loblolly pine silvopasture in the Mid‐South USA

Christine C. Nieman, Jonathan O. C. Kubesch, D. Philipp
Crop Forage & Turfgrass Management
Agroforestry and silvopastoral systems
article

Forage mass and botanical composition of four annual forages grown in a loblolly pine silvopasture in the Mid‐South USA

Christine C. Nieman, Jonathan O. C. Kubesch, D. Philipp
article en

Abstract

Abstract Annual forages are commonly planted in open pasture in the Mid‐South, but there is little information on the productivity of these forages when incorporated into silvopasture. The objective was to evaluate four annual forages adapted to the Mid‐South, namely, arrowleaf clover ( Trifolium vesiculosum Savi), crimson clover ( Trifolium incarnatum L.), tetraploid annual ryegrass ( Lolium multiflorum L.), and diploid annual ryegrass ( Lolium multiflorum L.), in a loblolly pine ( Pinus taeda L.) silvopasture for seasonal forage mass distribution and annual forage accumulation. The forages were tested in a randomized complete block design with three replicates and three harvests per year: Harvest 1 (H1, April), Harvest 2 (H2, May), and Harvest 3 (H3, July) from 2020 to 2022. Both annual ryegrass types had greater forage mass for H1 and H2, with minimal regrowth after H2 and low forage mass for H3. Both annual ryegrass types outperformed the legumes, which largely failed to establish in this environment, contributing <22% of forage mass across harvests despite adequate soil pH, seed bed preparation, and inoculation. Both annual ryegrass types had greater forage mass in the loblolly silvopasture system for H1 and H2 and are more suitable forages for the system than the legumes tested.

Crop Forage & Turfgrass ManagementVol. 11(2)
University of Arkansas System (US), Dale Bumpers Small Farms Research Center (US), University of Arkansas at Fayetteville (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 60%
Agroforestry and silvopastoral systems
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.