Roles for somatostatin and parvalbumin interneurons in learning and arousal during trace conditioning

Neural circuits must integrate sensory cues and their outcomes to guide learning, yet how distinct inhibitory interneurons contribute to this process remains a central question. This study investigates the specific roles of somatostatin (SST) and parvalbumin (PV) interneurons in the primary somatosensory cortex during trace eyeblink conditioning. We found that SST interneuron activity dynamically tracked the development of learned, anticipatory blinks, declining as learning progressed. Conversely, PV interneuron activity was coupled to locomotion, a proxy for arousal, following the aversive stimulus but was absent during the predictive cue window. Nicotinic cholinergic signaling selectively modulated SST responses. These results demonstrate a functional dissociation: SST interneurons refine predictive motor responses, while PV interneurons process affective arousal. This reveals a fundamental division of labor within cortical microcircuits for segregating and integrating distinct dimensions of learning.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
iScience
Published
2025-11-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isci.2025.114004
Primary Topic
Memory and Neural Mechanisms
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Roles for somatostatin and parvalbumin interneurons in learning and arousal during trace conditioning

Jiaman Dai, Qian‐Quan Sun
iScience
Memory and Neural Mechanisms
article

Roles for somatostatin and parvalbumin interneurons in learning and arousal during trace conditioning

Jiaman Dai, Qian‐Quan Sun
article en

Abstract

Neural circuits must integrate sensory cues and their outcomes to guide learning, yet how distinct inhibitory interneurons contribute to this process remains a central question. This study investigates the specific roles of somatostatin (SST) and parvalbumin (PV) interneurons in the primary somatosensory cortex during trace eyeblink conditioning. We found that SST interneuron activity dynamically tracked the development of learned, anticipatory blinks, declining as learning progressed. Conversely, PV interneuron activity was coupled to locomotion, a proxy for arousal, following the aversive stimulus but was absent during the predictive cue window. Nicotinic cholinergic signaling selectively modulated SST responses. These results demonstrate a functional dissociation: SST interneurons refine predictive motor responses, while PV interneurons process affective arousal. This reveals a fundamental division of labor within cortical microcircuits for segregating and integrating distinct dimensions of learning.

iScienceVol. 28(12)
University of Wyoming (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 64%
Memory and Neural Mechanisms
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.