Association between daily dose of dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors and change in glycated hemoglobin in patients with type 2 diabetes: interpretation of mixed-effects machine-learning models using electronic medical records

Many randomized, placebo-controlled trials suggest that the dose–response relationship between dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors and change in HbA1c (ΔHbA1c) is non-linear. However, in the real world, patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) receive varying doses over time depending on their glycemic control. Therefore, to accurately capture real-world HbA1c variability, longitudinal medical records reflecting these dose changes must be analyzed. Crucially, the analysis must also account for the influence of potential confounding factors on HbA1c. Linear mixed-effects models cannot adequately assess this non-linear relationship. The aim of this study was to evaluate the association between daily dose of DPP-4 inhibitors and ΔHbA1c in the real world by developing and interpreting tree-based machine-learning models with random effects. Longitudinal information on T2D patients was extracted from electronic medical records. Four machine-learning models with random effects were constructed to predict change in HbA1c: linear mixed-effects models (LMMs) with/without a backward elimination method, a mixed-effects random forest model (MERF), and a combining tree-boosting with Gaussian process and mixed-effects model (GPBoost). The MERF and GPBoost were interpreted by SHapley Additive exPlanations and partial dependence. Non-linear machine-learning models such as MERF and GPBoost had better predictive performance than LMMs. When interpreting MERF and GPBoost, HbA1c level decreased in a dose-dependent manner within the range of sitagliptin 0–50 mg/day, but no difference was observed between 50 and 100 mg/day. For teneligliptin, while 10 mg/day was suggested to have a slightly weaker HbA1c-lowering effect than 20 or 40 mg/day, there was no difference between 20 and 40 mg/day. Regarding vildagliptin, 100 mg/day showed a tendency to lower HbA1c level more than 50 mg/day. Non-linear machine-learning models can clearly demonstrate the dose–response relationship of the HbA1c-lowering effects of DPP-4 inhibitors in real-world T2D patients. For sitagliptin and teneligliptin, the HbA1c-lowering effect plateaued within the approved dose range. With regard to vildagliptin, it is unclear whether dose–response saturation was observed due to the limited number of dosing regimens. Our findings support the results of previous trials, and machine-learning models demonstrated that it is possible to evaluate the dose–response relationship in the real world.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Pharmacology and Toxicology
Published
2025-11-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s40360-025-01055-2
Primary Topic
Diabetes Treatment and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Association between daily dose of dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors and change in glycated hemoglobin in patients with type 2 diabetes: interpretation of mixed-effects machine-learning models using electronic medical records

Hayato Akimoto, Takuya Nagashima, Yasuo Takahashi, Kimino Minagawa et al.
BMC Pharmacology and Toxicology
Diabetes Treatment and Management
article

Association between daily dose of dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors and change in glycated hemoglobin in patients with type 2 diabetes: interpretation of mixed-effects machine-learning models using electronic medical records

Hayato Akimoto, Takuya Nagashima, Yasuo Takahashi, Kimino Minagawa, Satoshi Asai, T. Hayakawa
article en

Abstract

Many randomized, placebo-controlled trials suggest that the dose–response relationship between dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors and change in HbA1c (ΔHbA1c) is non-linear. However, in the real world, patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) receive varying doses over time depending on their glycemic control. Therefore, to accurately capture real-world HbA1c variability, longitudinal medical records reflecting these dose changes must be analyzed. Crucially, the analysis must also account for the influence of potential confounding factors on HbA1c. Linear mixed-effects models cannot adequately assess this non-linear relationship. The aim of this study was to evaluate the association between daily dose of DPP-4 inhibitors and ΔHbA1c in the real world by developing and interpreting tree-based machine-learning models with random effects. Longitudinal information on T2D patients was extracted from electronic medical records. Four machine-learning models with random effects were constructed to predict change in HbA1c: linear mixed-effects models (LMMs) with/without a backward elimination method, a mixed-effects random forest model (MERF), and a combining tree-boosting with Gaussian process and mixed-effects model (GPBoost). The MERF and GPBoost were interpreted by SHapley Additive exPlanations and partial dependence. Non-linear machine-learning models such as MERF and GPBoost had better predictive performance than LMMs. When interpreting MERF and GPBoost, HbA1c level decreased in a dose-dependent manner within the range of sitagliptin 0–50 mg/day, but no difference was observed between 50 and 100 mg/day. For teneligliptin, while 10 mg/day was suggested to have a slightly weaker HbA1c-lowering effect than 20 or 40 mg/day, there was no difference between 20 and 40 mg/day. Regarding vildagliptin, 100 mg/day showed a tendency to lower HbA1c level more than 50 mg/day. Non-linear machine-learning models can clearly demonstrate the dose–response relationship of the HbA1c-lowering effects of DPP-4 inhibitors in real-world T2D patients. For sitagliptin and teneligliptin, the HbA1c-lowering effect plateaued within the approved dose range. With regard to vildagliptin, it is unclear whether dose–response saturation was observed due to the limited number of dosing regimens. Our findings support the results of previous trials, and machine-learning models demonstrated that it is possible to evaluate the dose–response relationship in the real world.

BMC Pharmacology and ToxicologyVol. 26(1)
Nihon University (JP)
Openalex Percentile: Top 52%
Diabetes Treatment and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.