Environmental protection tax and green total-factor energy efficiency: From the perspective of dual mediation and dual moderation

• Explore the impact of environmental protection tax (EPT) on green total-factor energy efficiency (GTFEE). • Integrate a theoretical framework of macro–micro dual pathways and government-public dual participation. • The implementation of EPT can significantly improve GTFEE. • EPT enhances GTFEE through industrial agglomeration and green innovation at macro and micro level. • The government finance and public concern play moderating roles between EPT and GTFEE. Enhancing energy efficiency is essential for promoting urban green transformation to achieve high-quality development. The Environmental Protection Tax (EPT) Law implemented in 2018, as a market-incentivized environmental regulation, establishes new institutional conditions to effectively tackle the dual challenges of energy and environmental issues, while improving green total-factor energy efficiency (GTFEE). However, the relationship between the two remains underexplored. Based on this, this study constructs a comprehensive theoretical framework of macro–micro dual pathways and government-public dual participation. Then, using the panel data of 282 Chinese cities spanning 2011 to 2023, it regards the implementation of EPT as a quasi-natural experiment, and applies the difference-in-differences (DID) model to compare the impact of EPT on GTFEE before and after 2018, thereby empirically analyzing the policy’s effect on GTFEE. Additionally, it explores the mediating and moderating roles in the relationship between EPT and GTFEE, while analyzing the heterogeneity facilitation relationship in cities with different characteristic, leading to the following conclusions. First, EPT can significantly improve GTFEE considering several robustness tests. Second, from the perspective of mediating mechanisms, EPT enhances GTFEE through industrial agglomeration at the macro level and green innovation at the micro level. Third, from the perspective of moderating effect, the financial intervention weakens the positive influence of EPT and GTFEE, while the public environmental concern strengthens the positive influence of EPT and GTFEE. Fourth, the examination of heterogeneity reveals that the promoting effect of EPT on GTFEE is larger in non-resource-based cities and old industrial base cities than in resource-based cities and non-old industrial base cities. These findings clarify the multi-dimensional action mechanism of EPT on GTFEE, and emphasize the critical roles of environmental policies, industrial agglomeration, green innovation, government functions, and public concern in improving GTFEE.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Energy Conversion and Management X
Published
2025-11-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecmx.2025.101405
Primary Topic
Energy, Environment, Economic Growth
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Environmental protection tax and green total-factor energy efficiency: From the perspective of dual mediation and dual moderation

Hanying Zhang, Guogang Wang
Energy Conversion and Management X
Energy, Environment, Economic Growth
article

Environmental protection tax and green total-factor energy efficiency: From the perspective of dual mediation and dual moderation

Hanying Zhang, Guogang Wang
article en

Abstract

• Explore the impact of environmental protection tax (EPT) on green total-factor energy efficiency (GTFEE). • Integrate a theoretical framework of macro–micro dual pathways and government-public dual participation. • The implementation of EPT can significantly improve GTFEE. • EPT enhances GTFEE through industrial agglomeration and green innovation at macro and micro level. • The government finance and public concern play moderating roles between EPT and GTFEE. Enhancing energy efficiency is essential for promoting urban green transformation to achieve high-quality development. The Environmental Protection Tax (EPT) Law implemented in 2018, as a market-incentivized environmental regulation, establishes new institutional conditions to effectively tackle the dual challenges of energy and environmental issues, while improving green total-factor energy efficiency (GTFEE). However, the relationship between the two remains underexplored. Based on this, this study constructs a comprehensive theoretical framework of macro–micro dual pathways and government-public dual participation. Then, using the panel data of 282 Chinese cities spanning 2011 to 2023, it regards the implementation of EPT as a quasi-natural experiment, and applies the difference-in-differences (DID) model to compare the impact of EPT on GTFEE before and after 2018, thereby empirically analyzing the policy’s effect on GTFEE. Additionally, it explores the mediating and moderating roles in the relationship between EPT and GTFEE, while analyzing the heterogeneity facilitation relationship in cities with different characteristic, leading to the following conclusions. First, EPT can significantly improve GTFEE considering several robustness tests. Second, from the perspective of mediating mechanisms, EPT enhances GTFEE through industrial agglomeration at the macro level and green innovation at the micro level. Third, from the perspective of moderating effect, the financial intervention weakens the positive influence of EPT and GTFEE, while the public environmental concern strengthens the positive influence of EPT and GTFEE. Fourth, the examination of heterogeneity reveals that the promoting effect of EPT on GTFEE is larger in non-resource-based cities and old industrial base cities than in resource-based cities and non-old industrial base cities. These findings clarify the multi-dimensional action mechanism of EPT on GTFEE, and emphasize the critical roles of environmental policies, industrial agglomeration, green innovation, government functions, and public concern in improving GTFEE.

Energy Conversion and Management XVol. 29
Institute of Agricultural Economics and Development (CN), Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 56%
Energy, Environment, Economic Growth
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.