Impacted Fish Bones: A National Survey

Background Impacted fish bones are a common referral to the ear, nose, and throat (ENT) acute on-call service. Diagnosis is often challenging as neither lateral neck radiograph (X-ray) nor flexible nasendoscopy (FNE) is perfectly sensitive. Management dilemmas are common, particularly as bones can result in significant complications. Objectives The objective of the study is to assess awareness of current ENT UK guidelines, investigate practice patterns, and identify knowledge gaps in the management of patients presenting with suspected fish bone foreign bodies in the upper aerodigestive tract. Design This is a cross-sectional survey study. Setting A UK-wide survey was distributed across ENT departments. Participants Fifty-three respondents comprise consultants, higher specialty ENT trainees, core surgical trainees, general practice (GP) trainees, and foundation doctors. Main outcome measures The main outcome measures are clinician awareness of ENT UK guidelines, confidence in management, preferred investigation pathways, knowledge of radio-opaque versus radiolucent fish species, and common symptoms, findings, and complications associated with fish bone foreign bodies. Results Of the 53 clinicians surveyed, 48 (91%) were unaware of any guidelines for fish bone foreign body management, while only three (6%) identified the ENT UK guideline. Confidence in management was not significantly associated with seniority (p = 0.31). Knowledge of radiological characteristics of fish species was variable, with 35 (66%) correctly identifying radio-opaque species and six (11%) exclusively identifying radiolucent species. The most commonly reported presenting symptoms were odynophagia (n = 42, 79%), dysphagia (n = 38, 72%), and unilateral neck pain (n = 31, 58%). The palatine tonsils (n = 29, 55%) and tongue base (n = 24, 45%) were the most frequent anatomical sites for impaction. Computed tomography (CT) imaging was the most commonly selected subsequent investigation when initial assessments (FNE or X-ray) were inconclusive (n = 40, 75%). Conclusions This study reveals significant variability in the awareness, investigation, and management of fish bone foreign bodies among ENT clinicians in the UK. There is a need for updated, post-pandemic guidelines alongside targeted education to enhance clinical confidence, reduce unnecessary investigations, and improve patient outcomes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cureus
Published
2025-11-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.97496
Primary Topic
Foreign Body Medical Cases
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Impacted Fish Bones: A National Survey

Jemma Butler, Neil Giblett, Andrew Mowat, Adan Chew
Cureus
Foreign Body Medical Cases
article

Impacted Fish Bones: A National Survey

Jemma Butler, Neil Giblett, Andrew Mowat, Adan Chew
article en

Abstract

Background Impacted fish bones are a common referral to the ear, nose, and throat (ENT) acute on-call service. Diagnosis is often challenging as neither lateral neck radiograph (X-ray) nor flexible nasendoscopy (FNE) is perfectly sensitive. Management dilemmas are common, particularly as bones can result in significant complications. Objectives The objective of the study is to assess awareness of current ENT UK guidelines, investigate practice patterns, and identify knowledge gaps in the management of patients presenting with suspected fish bone foreign bodies in the upper aerodigestive tract. Design This is a cross-sectional survey study. Setting A UK-wide survey was distributed across ENT departments. Participants Fifty-three respondents comprise consultants, higher specialty ENT trainees, core surgical trainees, general practice (GP) trainees, and foundation doctors. Main outcome measures The main outcome measures are clinician awareness of ENT UK guidelines, confidence in management, preferred investigation pathways, knowledge of radio-opaque versus radiolucent fish species, and common symptoms, findings, and complications associated with fish bone foreign bodies. Results Of the 53 clinicians surveyed, 48 (91%) were unaware of any guidelines for fish bone foreign body management, while only three (6%) identified the ENT UK guideline. Confidence in management was not significantly associated with seniority (p = 0.31). Knowledge of radiological characteristics of fish species was variable, with 35 (66%) correctly identifying radio-opaque species and six (11%) exclusively identifying radiolucent species. The most commonly reported presenting symptoms were odynophagia (n = 42, 79%), dysphagia (n = 38, 72%), and unilateral neck pain (n = 31, 58%). The palatine tonsils (n = 29, 55%) and tongue base (n = 24, 45%) were the most frequent anatomical sites for impaction. Computed tomography (CT) imaging was the most commonly selected subsequent investigation when initial assessments (FNE or X-ray) were inconclusive (n = 40, 75%). Conclusions This study reveals significant variability in the awareness, investigation, and management of fish bone foreign bodies among ENT clinicians in the UK. There is a need for updated, post-pandemic guidelines alongside targeted education to enhance clinical confidence, reduce unnecessary investigations, and improve patient outcomes.

CureusVol. 17(11)
Barking, Havering And Redbridge University Hospitals NHS Trust (GB), Worcestershire Acute Hospitals NHS Trust (GB), The Royal Wolverhampton NHS Trust (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 49%
Foreign Body Medical Cases
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.