Nietzsche's perspectives on suffering

Suffering figures in a number of related and sometimes overlapping themes throughout Nietzsche’s works, from The Birth of Tragedy to the works of his last productive year: representing suffering artistically so as to affirm life, undergoing suffering, inflicting it, witnessing it, inflicting it on oneself, seeking redemption through it, interpreting it retrospectively and giving it significance in one’s life, wanting to prevent it in others and resisting that desire, allowing it to happen to oneself and to others, and seeking it out as a challenge to overcome. The article argues that when we examine the diverse contexts in which Nietzsche discusses suffering, we should conclude that asking after the value of suffering for Nietzsche is mistaken. Part of Nietzsche’s contention against the ‘morality of compassion’ is the very assumption that there is such a thing as the value of suffering. Nietzsche espouses what has been called normative contextualism: whether any instance of suffering has positive, negative, or indifferent value will vary according to context or the relations it stands in to other events and attitudes. According to Nietzsche’s method of perspectival inquiry, we understand suffering better by engaging with ways in which suffering calls upon a range of affective responses.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Inquiry
Published
2025-11-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/0020174x.2025.2591737
Primary Topic
Nietzsche, Schopenhauer, and Hegel
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Nietzsche's perspectives on suffering

Christopher Janaway
Inquiry
Nietzsche, Schopenhauer, and Hegel
article

Nietzsche's perspectives on suffering

Christopher Janaway
article en

Abstract

Suffering figures in a number of related and sometimes overlapping themes throughout Nietzsche’s works, from The Birth of Tragedy to the works of his last productive year: representing suffering artistically so as to affirm life, undergoing suffering, inflicting it, witnessing it, inflicting it on oneself, seeking redemption through it, interpreting it retrospectively and giving it significance in one’s life, wanting to prevent it in others and resisting that desire, allowing it to happen to oneself and to others, and seeking it out as a challenge to overcome. The article argues that when we examine the diverse contexts in which Nietzsche discusses suffering, we should conclude that asking after the value of suffering for Nietzsche is mistaken. Part of Nietzsche’s contention against the ‘morality of compassion’ is the very assumption that there is such a thing as the value of suffering. Nietzsche espouses what has been called normative contextualism: whether any instance of suffering has positive, negative, or indifferent value will vary according to context or the relations it stands in to other events and attitudes. According to Nietzsche’s method of perspectival inquiry, we understand suffering better by engaging with ways in which suffering calls upon a range of affective responses.

InquiryVol. 69(3)
University of Southampton (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 68%
Nietzsche, Schopenhauer, and Hegel
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.