Disabled Youth Transitioning from Care: An International Policy Analysis

Abstract Many countries across the globe have enacted leaving care policy to make provision for transition planning and aftercare support for care-leavers who face significant challenges in adulthood. However, the extent to which care-leaver policy addresses the unique needs of disabled youth leaving care is not known. This paper seeks to address this gap in knowledge by analysing care-leaver policy in four countries (United States, United Kingdom, Norway and Australia) with a specific focus on how well they address disability issues. A key finding is the lack of consistency in the explicit recognition of disabled youth in care-leaving policy and an absence of directives to guide the adaptation and implementation of policy for disabled care-leavers. There is also a fragmentation in aftercare support with an increasing individualist approach grounded in normative assumptions for independent adulthood and a medical model of disability with a parallel retraction or redirection of formal regulation that impacts on disabled youth transitions from care. The paper concludes with recommendations for developing policy to give greater recognition to the needs of disabled care-leavers and their non-normative pathways from care into adulthood that require a refocus on interdependence, youth voice, extended aftercare support and collaborative services.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Child and Adolescent Social Work Journal
Published
2025-11-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10560-025-01061-7
Primary Topic
Child Welfare and Adoption
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Disabled Youth Transitioning from Care: An International Policy Analysis

Gilbert Gimm, Jemma Venables, Leah P. Cheatham, Jo Ann Lee et al.
Child and Adolescent Social Work Journal
Child Welfare and Adoption
article

Disabled Youth Transitioning from Care: An International Policy Analysis

Gilbert Gimm, Jemma Venables, Leah P. Cheatham, Jo Ann Lee, Kathy Ellem, Ingri‐Hanne Brænne Bennwik, Claire Baker, Berni Kelly, Oterholm Inger
article en

Abstract

Abstract Many countries across the globe have enacted leaving care policy to make provision for transition planning and aftercare support for care-leavers who face significant challenges in adulthood. However, the extent to which care-leaver policy addresses the unique needs of disabled youth leaving care is not known. This paper seeks to address this gap in knowledge by analysing care-leaver policy in four countries (United States, United Kingdom, Norway and Australia) with a specific focus on how well they address disability issues. A key finding is the lack of consistency in the explicit recognition of disabled youth in care-leaving policy and an absence of directives to guide the adaptation and implementation of policy for disabled care-leavers. There is also a fragmentation in aftercare support with an increasing individualist approach grounded in normative assumptions for independent adulthood and a medical model of disability with a parallel retraction or redirection of formal regulation that impacts on disabled youth transitions from care. The paper concludes with recommendations for developing policy to give greater recognition to the needs of disabled care-leavers and their non-normative pathways from care into adulthood that require a refocus on interdependence, youth voice, extended aftercare support and collaborative services.

Child and Adolescent Social Work Journal
Queen's University Belfast (GB), George Mason University (US), The University of Queensland (AU), University of Alabama (US), University of Johannesburg (ZA), VID Specialized University (NO), Coram (GB), University at Buffalo, State University of New York (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 64%
Child Welfare and Adoption
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.