Chasing Shadows: Predicting Outperformers in Private Assets

In this piece, we examine the practical challenges investors face when selecting private asset managers and allocating capital. Unlike public markets, private assets lack continuous pricing, making real-time performance assessment difficult. When practitioners assess a new vintage, they often rely on the performance of previous vintages available at that time. However, these <italic>contemporaneous</italic> performance metrics are noisy and unreliable, as they depend on reported NAV, which is not realized until the funds’ closure. We find that the gap between contemporaneous and realized returns is larger for funds with low distributions and following market drawdowns. Our findings show that relying solely on <italic>contemporaneous</italic> performance signals may not yield better outcomes than a simple equally weighted portfolio. Instead of focusing only on historical performance, greater emphasis should be placed on diversifying across funds and vintages.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Journal of Private Markets Investing
Published
2025-11-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3905/jpmi.2025.1.007
Primary Topic
Financial Markets and Investment Strategies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Chasing Shadows: Predicting Outperformers in Private Assets

Lloyd S. Han, Yuan Ren, Sean Klein, German Ramirez
The Journal of Private Markets Investing
Financial Markets and Investment Strategies
article

Chasing Shadows: Predicting Outperformers in Private Assets

Lloyd S. Han, Yuan Ren, Sean Klein, German Ramirez
article en

Abstract

In this piece, we examine the practical challenges investors face when selecting private asset managers and allocating capital. Unlike public markets, private assets lack continuous pricing, making real-time performance assessment difficult. When practitioners assess a new vintage, they often rely on the performance of previous vintages available at that time. However, these <italic>contemporaneous</italic> performance metrics are noisy and unreliable, as they depend on reported NAV, which is not realized until the funds’ closure. We find that the gap between contemporaneous and realized returns is larger for funds with low distributions and following market drawdowns. Our findings show that relying solely on <italic>contemporaneous</italic> performance signals may not yield better outcomes than a simple equally weighted portfolio. Instead of focusing only on historical performance, greater emphasis should be placed on diversifying across funds and vintages.

The Journal of Private Markets InvestingVol. 24(2)
Quantitative BioSciences (US), ISCO International (United States) (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 55%
Financial Markets and Investment Strategies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.