Advancing ecological assessment: towards the integration of eDNA metabarcoding into an estuarine fish index

• Surface water eDNA and bottom trawling were used to assess estuarine fish diversity. • eDNA, sampling organismal traces in the surface, produced higher species richness. • Bottom trawling, sampling fish, was more effective in detecting demersal species. • Due to different catchability, ecological status assessed with both methods differ. • Method-specific reference conditions are needed for ecological status classification. In the face of increasing anthropogenic pressures on estuarine ecosystems, methods to efficiently and reliably assess their ecological status are essential. This study explores the integration of environmental DNA analysis into the AZTI’s Fish Index (AFI) to assess ecological status of estuarine ecosystems. Surface water eDNA sampling and bottom trawl surveys were performed across multiple estuaries in the Basque Country, Spain, and resulting species data were used to calculate AFI scores. eDNA metabarcoding consistently detected higher fish species richness than bottom trawling, while the latter remained more effective at capturing demersal species. In general, ecological classifications from eDNA- and bottom trawl derived data displayed low concordance, largely due to differing species assemblages and metric contributions. These results emphasize the respective strengths and weaknesses of each methodology and the necessity for method-specific calibration. Considering that the AFI is calibrated using bottom trawl data, its direct application to eDNA-derived species lists may lead to some inconsistencies. This study underscores the critical necessity to establish eDNA-specific reference conditions and to recalibrate index thresholds accordingly. While eDNA approach may not entirely replace traditional methods, its scalability, sensitivity, and minimal ecological disturbances establish it as an essential complementary application within monitoring programs. This research strongly supports the urgent advancement of eDNA-based indices and the critical enhancement of reference conditions for their effective incorporation into ecological assessment frameworks under the Water Framework Directive.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Ecological Indicators
Published
2025-11-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2025.114464
Primary Topic
Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Advancing ecological assessment: towards the integration of eDNA metabarcoding into an estuarine fish index

Iñaki Mendibil, Oriol Canals, A. Uriarte, Naiara Rodríguez‐Ezpeleta et al.
Ecological Indicators
Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies
article

Advancing ecological assessment: towards the integration of eDNA metabarcoding into an estuarine fish index

Iñaki Mendibil, Oriol Canals, A. Uriarte, Naiara Rodríguez‐Ezpeleta, Mukesh P. Bhendarkar, Ángel Borja, Carlos Trujillo
article en

Abstract

• Surface water eDNA and bottom trawling were used to assess estuarine fish diversity. • eDNA, sampling organismal traces in the surface, produced higher species richness. • Bottom trawling, sampling fish, was more effective in detecting demersal species. • Due to different catchability, ecological status assessed with both methods differ. • Method-specific reference conditions are needed for ecological status classification. In the face of increasing anthropogenic pressures on estuarine ecosystems, methods to efficiently and reliably assess their ecological status are essential. This study explores the integration of environmental DNA analysis into the AZTI’s Fish Index (AFI) to assess ecological status of estuarine ecosystems. Surface water eDNA sampling and bottom trawl surveys were performed across multiple estuaries in the Basque Country, Spain, and resulting species data were used to calculate AFI scores. eDNA metabarcoding consistently detected higher fish species richness than bottom trawling, while the latter remained more effective at capturing demersal species. In general, ecological classifications from eDNA- and bottom trawl derived data displayed low concordance, largely due to differing species assemblages and metric contributions. These results emphasize the respective strengths and weaknesses of each methodology and the necessity for method-specific calibration. Considering that the AFI is calibrated using bottom trawl data, its direct application to eDNA-derived species lists may lead to some inconsistencies. This study underscores the critical necessity to establish eDNA-specific reference conditions and to recalibrate index thresholds accordingly. While eDNA approach may not entirely replace traditional methods, its scalability, sensitivity, and minimal ecological disturbances establish it as an essential complementary application within monitoring programs. This research strongly supports the urgent advancement of eDNA-based indices and the critical enhancement of reference conditions for their effective incorporation into ecological assessment frameworks under the Water Framework Directive.

Ecological IndicatorsVol. 181
AZTI (ES), Marine Technology Unit (ES), National Institute of Abiotic Stress Management (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 65%
Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.