Impactful environmental psychology needs formal theories

Changing individual and collective behavior is critical to addressing the climate and ecological crisis. Environmental psychology is thus well-positioned to contribute knowledge to guide impactful climate action. However, we argue that it is not living up to its full potential, partly because its theories often remain verbal. Formalizing theories — expressing them in the precise language of mathematics or computer code — is especially important to give substance to thinking about complex systems, where nonlinearities and feedback loops make the effect of interventions hard to predict. Formal theories increase conceptual clarity and mechanistic understanding, advance cumulative science, enable ‘ in silico ’ intervention testing, and improve integration into policy-relevant models. We illustrate how environmental psychologists can start incorporating theory formalization in their work. • Environmental psychology is dominated by theories expressed in natural language. • Such verbal theories are often too vague to enable precise predictions. • Formalizing theories has many benefits for environmental psychology. • Formal theories help to better understand, predict and influence behavior.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences
Published
2025-11-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cobeha.2025.101619
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Climate Change Communication and Perception
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.20

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Impactful environmental psychology needs formal theories

Fabian Dablander, Anne E Urai, Jan Willem Bolderdijk
1 citations
Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences
Climate Change Communication and Perception
4.20
article

Impactful environmental psychology needs formal theories

Fabian Dablander, Anne E Urai, Jan Willem Bolderdijk
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Changing individual and collective behavior is critical to addressing the climate and ecological crisis. Environmental psychology is thus well-positioned to contribute knowledge to guide impactful climate action. However, we argue that it is not living up to its full potential, partly because its theories often remain verbal. Formalizing theories — expressing them in the precise language of mathematics or computer code — is especially important to give substance to thinking about complex systems, where nonlinearities and feedback loops make the effect of interventions hard to predict. Formal theories increase conceptual clarity and mechanistic understanding, advance cumulative science, enable ‘ in silico ’ intervention testing, and improve integration into policy-relevant models. We illustrate how environmental psychologists can start incorporating theory formalization in their work. • Environmental psychology is dominated by theories expressed in natural language. • Such verbal theories are often too vague to enable precise predictions. • Formalizing theories has many benefits for environmental psychology. • Formal theories help to better understand, predict and influence behavior.

Current Opinion in Behavioral SciencesVol. 66
Leiden University (NL), Amsterdam University College (NL), Amsterdam University of Applied Sciences (NL), University of Amsterdam (NL)
Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Climate Change Communication and Perception
4.20
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Impactful environmental psychology needs formal theories — Fabian Dablander, Anne E Urai, et al. · Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS