Towards a comprehensive framework of the institutional dimensions in entrepreneurship research

Abstract Rates of entrepreneurship differ significantly between countries. Previous studies have shown that the institutional context can explain these differences; in particular, the institutional dimensions approach has recently gained attention for its potential to explain entrepreneurial activity across countries. However, it is still unclear how this approach has evolved, what has been advanced and what remains to be done. Through a rigorous systematic analysis of 84 articles published in Q1 journals included in the Journal Citation Reports™ for the period 2000–2025, this study focuses on the utilization of institutional dimensions (regulative, normative and cultural-cognitive) as a conceptual framework, extending beyond the traditional examination of formal and informal institutions. The main findings reveal that (a) there is no consensus on the variables that measure the institutional dimensions, particularly the normative and cultural-cognitive dimensions; (b) additional research is needed on the interactions between the three dimensions and their effect on entrepreneurship; (c) there are relevant differences in the effects of institutional dimensions on different economic sectors and different types of entrepreneurship, such as opportunity or necessity; (d) each institutional dimension influences differently at each stage of the entrepreneurial process; and (e) there are still few academic publications using the institutional dimensions framework in the field of entrepreneurship, although the number of articles published recently is increasing. From these results, some opportunities for future research lines are derived.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Small Business Economics
Published
2025-11-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-025-01124-0
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Entrepreneurship Studies and Influences
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
5.52
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Towards a comprehensive framework of the institutional dimensions in entrepreneurship research

Claudia Álvarez, Tatiana Lopez, David Urbano
2 citations
Small Business Economics
Entrepreneurship Studies and Influences
5.52
article

Towards a comprehensive framework of the institutional dimensions in entrepreneurship research

Claudia Álvarez, Tatiana Lopez, David Urbano
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Abstract Rates of entrepreneurship differ significantly between countries. Previous studies have shown that the institutional context can explain these differences; in particular, the institutional dimensions approach has recently gained attention for its potential to explain entrepreneurial activity across countries. However, it is still unclear how this approach has evolved, what has been advanced and what remains to be done. Through a rigorous systematic analysis of 84 articles published in Q1 journals included in the Journal Citation Reports™ for the period 2000–2025, this study focuses on the utilization of institutional dimensions (regulative, normative and cultural-cognitive) as a conceptual framework, extending beyond the traditional examination of formal and informal institutions. The main findings reveal that (a) there is no consensus on the variables that measure the institutional dimensions, particularly the normative and cultural-cognitive dimensions; (b) additional research is needed on the interactions between the three dimensions and their effect on entrepreneurship; (c) there are relevant differences in the effects of institutional dimensions on different economic sectors and different types of entrepreneurship, such as opportunity or necessity; (d) each institutional dimension influences differently at each stage of the entrepreneurial process; and (e) there are still few academic publications using the institutional dimensions framework in the field of entrepreneurship, although the number of articles published recently is increasing. From these results, some opportunities for future research lines are derived.

Small Business EconomicsVol. 66(3)
Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (ES), Centre for Research on Ecology and Forestry Applications (ES), Universidad EAFIT (CO), University of Monterrey (MX), Tecnológico de Monterrey (MX)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Entrepreneurship Studies and Influences
5.52
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.