Research Units as Social Groups: The Impact of Virtual Meetings on the Persistence of Academic Labs

Abstract Innovative research emerges within research units that pool a rich treasure trove of experience, knowledge, and practices, and collaborate on complex experiments and research setups. But how can members of a research unit also understand themselves as a cohesive unit? What role do regular meetings play in this understanding? And how can a research unit withstand external influences that represent a deviation from normality? Using Neidhardt’s group sociology and qualitative guided interviews with members of university research units, the paper examines the importance of regular face-to-face meetings for the sociality of a research unit and the impact of the transition to virtual meetings on the unit and its perceived persistence. The results suggest that research units persist as social groups even in virtual settings, albeit with certain limitations. To strengthen the sociality of research units, regular meetings should be held with all members physically present.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Minerva
Published
2025-11-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11024-025-09619-6
Primary Topic
Team Dynamics and Performance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Research Units as Social Groups: The Impact of Virtual Meetings on the Persistence of Academic Labs

Laura Paruschke
Minerva
Team Dynamics and Performance
article

Research Units as Social Groups: The Impact of Virtual Meetings on the Persistence of Academic Labs

Laura Paruschke
article en

Abstract

Abstract Innovative research emerges within research units that pool a rich treasure trove of experience, knowledge, and practices, and collaborate on complex experiments and research setups. But how can members of a research unit also understand themselves as a cohesive unit? What role do regular meetings play in this understanding? And how can a research unit withstand external influences that represent a deviation from normality? Using Neidhardt’s group sociology and qualitative guided interviews with members of university research units, the paper examines the importance of regular face-to-face meetings for the sociality of a research unit and the impact of the transition to virtual meetings on the unit and its perceived persistence. The results suggest that research units persist as social groups even in virtual settings, albeit with certain limitations. To strengthen the sociality of research units, regular meetings should be held with all members physically present.

Minerva
Leibniz University Hannover (DE)
Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz Universität Hannover, Leibniz-Gemeinschaft
Openalex Percentile: Top 59%
Team Dynamics and Performance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.