Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the German version of the Birth Satisfaction Scale-Revised (BSS-R)

Up to one third of women are dissatisfied with their birth experience. A negative birth experience can have detrimental outcomes, making an early detection of dissatisfaction with the birth experience very important. The Birth Satisfaction Scale-Revised (BSS-R) is a multi-dimensional measure of birth satisfaction, which has been translated into several languages. The current study aimed to translate and validate a German version of the BSS-R (DE-BSS-R). A total of 3747 German women, who were participating in the cross-sectional study INVITE, completed the DE-BSS-R 3–4 months postpartum. The factor structure of the DE-BSS-R was tested using confirmatory factor analysis. Moreover, internal consistency as well as known-groups discriminant, divergent, convergent, and predictive validity were evaluated. Both the tri-dimensional and the bi-factor measurement model of the original BSS-R showed excellent fit to the data. Internal consistency was acceptable for the total score and the subscale Women’s personal attributes, but just below the recommended cut-off for the subscales Stress experienced during labour and Quality of care. However, Cronbach’s alpha did not differ significantly from the acceptable alpha values of the original BSS-R. Women with a non-instrumental vaginal birth had significantly higher birth satisfaction than women with an instrumental birth (instrumental vaginal, caesarean section). The DE-BSS-R showed good divergent, convergent, and predictive validity. Overall, the German cross-cultural adaptation of the BSS-R showed excellent psychometric properties. Both the total score and the three subscale scores are valid to quickly measure German women’s satisfaction with birth in research and clinical practice.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Public Health
Published
2025-11-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-025-25563-2
Primary Topic
Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the German version of the Birth Satisfaction Scale-Revised (BSS-R)

Julia Schellong, Susan Garthus‐Niegel, Amera Mojahed, Lara Seefeld et al.
BMC Public Health
Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions
article

Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the German version of the Birth Satisfaction Scale-Revised (BSS-R)

Julia Schellong, Susan Garthus‐Niegel, Amera Mojahed, Lara Seefeld, Caroline J. Hollins Martin, Colin R. Martin
article en

Abstract

Up to one third of women are dissatisfied with their birth experience. A negative birth experience can have detrimental outcomes, making an early detection of dissatisfaction with the birth experience very important. The Birth Satisfaction Scale-Revised (BSS-R) is a multi-dimensional measure of birth satisfaction, which has been translated into several languages. The current study aimed to translate and validate a German version of the BSS-R (DE-BSS-R). A total of 3747 German women, who were participating in the cross-sectional study INVITE, completed the DE-BSS-R 3–4 months postpartum. The factor structure of the DE-BSS-R was tested using confirmatory factor analysis. Moreover, internal consistency as well as known-groups discriminant, divergent, convergent, and predictive validity were evaluated. Both the tri-dimensional and the bi-factor measurement model of the original BSS-R showed excellent fit to the data. Internal consistency was acceptable for the total score and the subscale Women’s personal attributes, but just below the recommended cut-off for the subscales Stress experienced during labour and Quality of care. However, Cronbach’s alpha did not differ significantly from the acceptable alpha values of the original BSS-R. Women with a non-instrumental vaginal birth had significantly higher birth satisfaction than women with an instrumental birth (instrumental vaginal, caesarean section). The DE-BSS-R showed good divergent, convergent, and predictive validity. Overall, the German cross-cultural adaptation of the BSS-R showed excellent psychometric properties. Both the total score and the three subscale scores are valid to quickly measure German women’s satisfaction with birth in research and clinical practice.

BMC Public HealthVol. 25(1)
University of Suffolk (GB), Dalhousie University (CA), Norwegian Institute of Public Health (NO), Vytautas Magnus University (LT), Edinburgh Napier University (GB), MSH Medical School Hamburg – University of Applied Sciences and Medical University (DE), Technische Universität Dresden (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 54%
Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.