Extended Mixed B‐Spline Material Point Method With Nitsche's Method for Quasi‐Compressible Soft Materials

ABSTRACT Soft materials, including elastomers, gels, and biological tissues, undergo extreme, complex deformations under near‐incompressibility, posing significant challenges for numerical modeling. The hybrid Eulerian–Lagrangian particle‐based approach, the Material Point Method (MPM), offers advantages for modeling these behaviors, but challenges remain, including prescribing essential boundary conditions, volumetric locking, cut‐cell instabilities, and cell crossing errors. In this work, we introduce an extended mixed B‐spline MPM that integrates subdivision‐stabilized displacement–pressure interpolations with the Nitsche method for weak enforcement of essential boundary conditions. The subdivision‐based mixed formulation ensures smooth, oscillation‐free pressure and stress fields throughout the simulations while alleviating volumetric locking in quasi‐compressible problems. The extended B‐spline approach improves numerical stability at domain boundaries by mitigating ill‐conditioning in the stiffness matrix, while higher‐order interpolations reduce cell‐crossing errors. The symmetric Nitsche method preserves the symmetry of the stiffness matrix, enabling efficient mechanical stability analysis in implicit MPM. Numerical examples—including torsional buckling, pore collapse, and soft metamaterial compression—demonstrate the method's robustness in capturing highly nonlinear mechanical responses under extreme deformations. The developed framework provides a stable and efficient particle‐based approach for simulating soft materials and can be extended to multi‐field coupled problems.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering
Published
2025-11-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/nme.70185
Primary Topic
Fluid Dynamics Simulations and Interactions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Extended Mixed B‐Spline Material Point Method With Nitsche's Method for Quasi‐Compressible Soft Materials

Ashkan Ali Madadi, Berkin Dortdivanlioglu
International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering
Fluid Dynamics Simulations and Interactions
article

Extended Mixed B‐Spline Material Point Method With Nitsche's Method for Quasi‐Compressible Soft Materials

Ashkan Ali Madadi, Berkin Dortdivanlioglu
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Soft materials, including elastomers, gels, and biological tissues, undergo extreme, complex deformations under near‐incompressibility, posing significant challenges for numerical modeling. The hybrid Eulerian–Lagrangian particle‐based approach, the Material Point Method (MPM), offers advantages for modeling these behaviors, but challenges remain, including prescribing essential boundary conditions, volumetric locking, cut‐cell instabilities, and cell crossing errors. In this work, we introduce an extended mixed B‐spline MPM that integrates subdivision‐stabilized displacement–pressure interpolations with the Nitsche method for weak enforcement of essential boundary conditions. The subdivision‐based mixed formulation ensures smooth, oscillation‐free pressure and stress fields throughout the simulations while alleviating volumetric locking in quasi‐compressible problems. The extended B‐spline approach improves numerical stability at domain boundaries by mitigating ill‐conditioning in the stiffness matrix, while higher‐order interpolations reduce cell‐crossing errors. The symmetric Nitsche method preserves the symmetry of the stiffness matrix, enabling efficient mechanical stability analysis in implicit MPM. Numerical examples—including torsional buckling, pore collapse, and soft metamaterial compression—demonstrate the method's robustness in capturing highly nonlinear mechanical responses under extreme deformations. The developed framework provides a stable and efficient particle‐based approach for simulating soft materials and can be extended to multi‐field coupled problems.

International Journal for Numerical Methods in EngineeringVol. 126(22)
The University of Texas at Austin (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 63%
Fluid Dynamics Simulations and Interactions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.