Boost or Bust? The Impact of Supplementation on Functional Genetic Diversity and Selective Processes in Tasmanian Devils

Translocating individuals into existing populations of conspecifics can support threatened species by increasing population size, maintaining genetic diversity and reducing the risk of inbreeding. However, for species whose adaptive potential is compromised due to ongoing threats, like disease, the outcome of such management interventions becomes more complex. The Tasmanian devil (Sarcophilus harrisii) is a prime example, where the emergence of Devil Facial Tumour Disease (DFTD) has led to significant population declines, raising concerns about their long-term survival. It is therefore critical to understand if the introduction of new functional genetic variants through supplementation actions enhances, or potentially hinders, their long-term persistence. We investigated changes in functional gene diversity at both the population- and individual-levels, pre- and post-supplementation, across multiple wild devil sites (four supplemented and four not supplemented). We found that functional diversity increased post-supplementation. Though the magnitude of change was varied among sites, a similar site-specific pattern was also evident in genome-wide diversity. Importantly, we saw no evidence of swamping of local alleles or those putatively associated with DFTD regressions. This is likely due to the source population representing the broad wild genetic diversity and supplementations facilitating gene flow across the current fragmented landscape. Continued and long-term monitoring at multiple wild sites will be necessary to determine whether future generations retain this introduced genetic variation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Molecular Ecology
Published
2025-11-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/mec.70188
Primary Topic
Veterinary Oncology Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Boost or Bust? The Impact of Supplementation on Functional Genetic Diversity and Selective Processes in Tasmanian Devils

Katherine A. Farquharson, Andrew V. Lee, Kimberley C. Batley, Luke W. Silver et al.
Molecular Ecology
Veterinary Oncology Research
article

Boost or Bust? The Impact of Supplementation on Functional Genetic Diversity and Selective Processes in Tasmanian Devils

Katherine A. Farquharson, Andrew V. Lee, Kimberley C. Batley, Luke W. Silver, Katherine Belov, Carolyn J. Hogg, Samantha Fox, Andrea L. Schraven
article en

Abstract

Translocating individuals into existing populations of conspecifics can support threatened species by increasing population size, maintaining genetic diversity and reducing the risk of inbreeding. However, for species whose adaptive potential is compromised due to ongoing threats, like disease, the outcome of such management interventions becomes more complex. The Tasmanian devil (Sarcophilus harrisii) is a prime example, where the emergence of Devil Facial Tumour Disease (DFTD) has led to significant population declines, raising concerns about their long-term survival. It is therefore critical to understand if the introduction of new functional genetic variants through supplementation actions enhances, or potentially hinders, their long-term persistence. We investigated changes in functional gene diversity at both the population- and individual-levels, pre- and post-supplementation, across multiple wild devil sites (four supplemented and four not supplemented). We found that functional diversity increased post-supplementation. Though the magnitude of change was varied among sites, a similar site-specific pattern was also evident in genome-wide diversity. Importantly, we saw no evidence of swamping of local alleles or those putatively associated with DFTD regressions. This is likely due to the source population representing the broad wild genetic diversity and supplementations facilitating gene flow across the current fragmented landscape. Continued and long-term monitoring at multiple wild sites will be necessary to determine whether future generations retain this introduced genetic variation.

Molecular EcologyVol. 34(24)
The University of Sydney (AU), University of Tasmania (AU), Columbus Zoo and Aquarium (US), Department of Natural Resources and Environment Tasmania (AU), Tasmanian Abalone Council (Australia) (AU), ARC Centre of Excellence for Innovations in Peptide and Protein Science (AU), University of Toledo (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 49%
Veterinary Oncology Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.