Knowledge and attitude as predictors of malaria prevention practices among pregnant women attending antenatal services at Asubiaro state hospital, Osun state, Nigeria

Malaria remains a significant public health concern, particularly among pregnant women in malaria-endemic regions such as Nigeria. This study examined knowledge and attitude as a predictor of malaria prevention practices among pregnant women attending the State Hospital in Osun State, Nigeria. A cross-sectional design was employed, using a systematic sampling method. Data were elicited using structured and validated questionnaire with Cronbach Alpha coefficient of 0.82. Data were analyzed using descriptive and inferential statistical techniques, including Pearson’s correlation and regression analysis and the significance level was set at p-value less than 0.05. The findings revealed that while 65.2% of respondents demonstrated high level of knowledge of malaria prevention, adherence to preventive practices varied; 63.3% reported consistently taking prescribed antimalarial medication, yet only 17.5% always slept under insecticide-treated nets (ITNs). Similarly, 75.4% of the respondents had a positive attitude towards malaria prevention practices. There was a significant relationship between respondents attitude and malaria prevention practice (p < 0.000). In addition, the number of previous pregnancies was significantly related to attitude (p = 0.035). With three to four previous pregnancies, the majority (93.7%) exhibited a positive attitude, while those with one to two pregnancies (82.9%) and those with five or more pregnancies (81.9%) had a lower proportion of positive attitudes. Though according to the regression model, attitude significantly influenced behaviour, and the relationship was statistically significant (p = 0.010). However, the R² value of 0.021 indicates that attitude explains only about 2.1% of the variation in behaviour. In other words, while attitude is a significant predictor, most of the differences in behaviour are explained by other factors not included in the model. The study concluded that while participants demonstrated good knowledge of malaria prevention, their attitudes were largely negative. Behavioural gaps persisted, influenced by external barriers such as limited healthcare access, low socioeconomic status, and discomfort associated with ITN use. The study recommends implementing targeted health education programs that focus on sustaining positive behaviours, strengthening ANC service delivery, and providing practical solutions to address ITN-related discomfort, thereby improving malaria prevention among pregnant women.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Discover Public Health
Published
2025-11-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12982-025-01148-7
Primary Topic
Malaria Research and Control
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Knowledge and attitude as predictors of malaria prevention practices among pregnant women attending antenatal services at Asubiaro state hospital, Osun state, Nigeria

Clarita Panuel-Egwakhe, Titilayo Olaoye, Gregory Emmanuel
Discover Public Health
Malaria Research and Control
article

Knowledge and attitude as predictors of malaria prevention practices among pregnant women attending antenatal services at Asubiaro state hospital, Osun state, Nigeria

Clarita Panuel-Egwakhe, Titilayo Olaoye, Gregory Emmanuel
article en

Abstract

Malaria remains a significant public health concern, particularly among pregnant women in malaria-endemic regions such as Nigeria. This study examined knowledge and attitude as a predictor of malaria prevention practices among pregnant women attending the State Hospital in Osun State, Nigeria. A cross-sectional design was employed, using a systematic sampling method. Data were elicited using structured and validated questionnaire with Cronbach Alpha coefficient of 0.82. Data were analyzed using descriptive and inferential statistical techniques, including Pearson’s correlation and regression analysis and the significance level was set at p-value less than 0.05. The findings revealed that while 65.2% of respondents demonstrated high level of knowledge of malaria prevention, adherence to preventive practices varied; 63.3% reported consistently taking prescribed antimalarial medication, yet only 17.5% always slept under insecticide-treated nets (ITNs). Similarly, 75.4% of the respondents had a positive attitude towards malaria prevention practices. There was a significant relationship between respondents attitude and malaria prevention practice (p < 0.000). In addition, the number of previous pregnancies was significantly related to attitude (p = 0.035). With three to four previous pregnancies, the majority (93.7%) exhibited a positive attitude, while those with one to two pregnancies (82.9%) and those with five or more pregnancies (81.9%) had a lower proportion of positive attitudes. Though according to the regression model, attitude significantly influenced behaviour, and the relationship was statistically significant (p = 0.010). However, the R² value of 0.021 indicates that attitude explains only about 2.1% of the variation in behaviour. In other words, while attitude is a significant predictor, most of the differences in behaviour are explained by other factors not included in the model. The study concluded that while participants demonstrated good knowledge of malaria prevention, their attitudes were largely negative. Behavioural gaps persisted, influenced by external barriers such as limited healthcare access, low socioeconomic status, and discomfort associated with ITN use. The study recommends implementing targeted health education programs that focus on sustaining positive behaviours, strengthening ANC service delivery, and providing practical solutions to address ITN-related discomfort, thereby improving malaria prevention among pregnant women.

Discover Public HealthVol. 22(1)
Babcock University (NG)
Openalex Percentile: Top 54%
Malaria Research and Control
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.