Crisis as Catalyst: An Inter‐Event Analysis of Social Policy Reforms in East Asia

ABSTRACT This paper explores the role of crises as critical catalysts for social policy reform, with a particular focus on social welfare programs, which act as essential safeguards during periods of turmoil. Employing a historical institutionalism framework and an inter‐event qualitative case study approach, this study investigates three major crises: the 1997 Asian financial crisis, the 2008 global financial crisis, and the COVID‐19 pandemic. Through a historical lens, the study identifies a general trajectory of social policy reform in East Asian countries, moving from the novel establishment or replacement of systems, to conversion, and ultimately to layering. From a functionalist perspective, social welfare programs are reformed in response to emerging risks, highlighting the dynamic interplay between crisis‐driven pressures and institutional adaptability. The paper also underscores the diversity of policy responses across countries. As an early‐bird, Japan's reforms mainly follow policy layering, while other latecomers focus on policy establishment and conversion. Over time, as social policy and welfare systems have become more comprehensive, countries have increasingly moved toward policy layering, focusing on incremental adjustments to ensure institutional stability and adaptability.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Social Policy and Administration
Published
2025-11-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/spol.70030
Primary Topic
Social Policy and Reform Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Crisis as Catalyst: An Inter‐Event Analysis of Social Policy Reforms in East Asia

Tao Liu, Lijuan Zhao, Xian-Fang Meng
Social Policy and Administration
Social Policy and Reform Studies
article

Crisis as Catalyst: An Inter‐Event Analysis of Social Policy Reforms in East Asia

Tao Liu, Lijuan Zhao, Xian-Fang Meng
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT This paper explores the role of crises as critical catalysts for social policy reform, with a particular focus on social welfare programs, which act as essential safeguards during periods of turmoil. Employing a historical institutionalism framework and an inter‐event qualitative case study approach, this study investigates three major crises: the 1997 Asian financial crisis, the 2008 global financial crisis, and the COVID‐19 pandemic. Through a historical lens, the study identifies a general trajectory of social policy reform in East Asian countries, moving from the novel establishment or replacement of systems, to conversion, and ultimately to layering. From a functionalist perspective, social welfare programs are reformed in response to emerging risks, highlighting the dynamic interplay between crisis‐driven pressures and institutional adaptability. The paper also underscores the diversity of policy responses across countries. As an early‐bird, Japan's reforms mainly follow policy layering, while other latecomers focus on policy establishment and conversion. Over time, as social policy and welfare systems have become more comprehensive, countries have increasingly moved toward policy layering, focusing on incremental adjustments to ensure institutional stability and adaptability.

Social Policy and Administration
Zhejiang University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 60%
Social Policy and Reform Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.