Ore-forming age and mineralization mechanism of the Biyushan submarine volcanic-hosted iron deposit in the Beishan orogenic belt: insights from zircon U-Pb dating, Hf isotopes, and magnetite texture and chemistry

In the Late Paleozoic, subduction-accretion processes in the Beishan and Tianshan orogenic belts of the Central Asian Orogenic Belt led to significant submarine volcanic-hosted iron mineralization. The origins of these deposits remain debated, with proposed models involving magmatic and magmatic-hydrothermal processes. This study examines the Biyushan iron deposit in the Beishan orogenic belt to investigate its metallogenic characteristics and its spatial–temporal connection with the Tianshan belt during Late Paleozoic iron (and copper) mineralization. Zircon U-Pb dating and Hf isotopic analysis of ore-hosting volcanic-subvolcanic rocks were conducted using LA-ICP-MS to determine the time of mineralization and the sources of materials. The formation ages of the mineralized host rock, propylitized plagioclase rhyolite, and the post-mineralization propylitized plagioclase rhyolite are 324.1 ± 0.95 Ma and 317.2 ± 1.2 Ma, respectively. Their respective zircon εHf(t) values range from 4.62 to 7.69 and −0.99 to 7.90. This indicates that the parental magma was likely derived from partial melting of either the depleted mantle or juvenile lower crust. In-situ LA-ICP-MS analysis of Biyushan magnetite from mineralization Stages I and II reveals high and widely varying Ti and V concentrations, indicating formation through magmatic and hydrothermal processes. These involved multiple medium- to high-temperature phases with significant fluid-rock interaction. Subsequent magnetite transformation occurred via fluid-induced dissolution-reprecipitation, oxidation-exsolution, dissolution reequilibration, and later hydrothermal metasomatism and alteration. A comparison of the Beishan and Tianshan metallogenic belts reveals shared geological settings, formation ages, and tectonic evolution. The Biyushan iron deposit is classified as a submarine volcanic-hosted iron deposit, formed in a southward subduction magmatic arc setting during the Late Carboniferous

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Ore Geology Reviews
Published
2025-11-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oregeorev.2025.106986
Primary Topic
Geological and Geochemical Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Ore-forming age and mineralization mechanism of the Biyushan submarine volcanic-hosted iron deposit in the Beishan orogenic belt: insights from zircon U-Pb dating, Hf isotopes, and magnetite texture and chemistry

Jichun Wang, Chao Wang, Wenjie Yang, Yanzhang Wang et al.
Ore Geology Reviews
Geological and Geochemical Analysis
article

Ore-forming age and mineralization mechanism of the Biyushan submarine volcanic-hosted iron deposit in the Beishan orogenic belt: insights from zircon U-Pb dating, Hf isotopes, and magnetite texture and chemistry

Jichun Wang, Chao Wang, Wenjie Yang, Yanzhang Wang, Zhenjiang Liu, Yang Yan, Jianping Wang, Zhuohang Ran
article en

Abstract

In the Late Paleozoic, subduction-accretion processes in the Beishan and Tianshan orogenic belts of the Central Asian Orogenic Belt led to significant submarine volcanic-hosted iron mineralization. The origins of these deposits remain debated, with proposed models involving magmatic and magmatic-hydrothermal processes. This study examines the Biyushan iron deposit in the Beishan orogenic belt to investigate its metallogenic characteristics and its spatial–temporal connection with the Tianshan belt during Late Paleozoic iron (and copper) mineralization. Zircon U-Pb dating and Hf isotopic analysis of ore-hosting volcanic-subvolcanic rocks were conducted using LA-ICP-MS to determine the time of mineralization and the sources of materials. The formation ages of the mineralized host rock, propylitized plagioclase rhyolite, and the post-mineralization propylitized plagioclase rhyolite are 324.1 ± 0.95 Ma and 317.2 ± 1.2 Ma, respectively. Their respective zircon εHf(t) values range from 4.62 to 7.69 and −0.99 to 7.90. This indicates that the parental magma was likely derived from partial melting of either the depleted mantle or juvenile lower crust. In-situ LA-ICP-MS analysis of Biyushan magnetite from mineralization Stages I and II reveals high and widely varying Ti and V concentrations, indicating formation through magmatic and hydrothermal processes. These involved multiple medium- to high-temperature phases with significant fluid-rock interaction. Subsequent magnetite transformation occurred via fluid-induced dissolution-reprecipitation, oxidation-exsolution, dissolution reequilibration, and later hydrothermal metasomatism and alteration. A comparison of the Beishan and Tianshan metallogenic belts reveals shared geological settings, formation ages, and tectonic evolution. The Biyushan iron deposit is classified as a submarine volcanic-hosted iron deposit, formed in a southward subduction magmatic arc setting during the Late Carboniferous

Ore Geology ReviewsVol. 187
Ministry of Natural Resources (CN), China Geological Survey (CN), China University of Geosciences (Beijing) (CN), Research Institute of Petroleum Exploration and Development (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 63%
Geological and Geochemical Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.