Systematically Thinking About Heritage

Heritage work requires collaboration across disciplinary specialties and with the people who create, use, and hold heritage. Communities of practice—like preservationists, interior designers, and historians—inherently rely on systems for structure, organization, relationships, boundaries, and identity. Systems thinking approaches are essential in rapidly changing circumstances. Modeling a complex interdisciplinary system of dynamic parts challenges heritage specialists to consider origins, implications, and consequences distant from, but linked to, heritage itself. Thinking about heritage as part of a system identifies a range of new opportunities and contexts for using and supporting heritage. This essay’s purpose centers on application—in how we use heritage in making decisions—rather than theory. Using a personal story about a longcase clock, the essay demonstrates how systematically thinking about heritage changes the focus of heritage work. The proposed heritage–human–ecology system model emphasizes the interaction of heritage and living.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Interior Design
Published
2025-11-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/10717641251396487
Primary Topic
Cultural Heritage Management and Preservation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Systematically Thinking About Heritage

Bryan D. Orthel
Journal of Interior Design
Cultural Heritage Management and Preservation
article

Systematically Thinking About Heritage

Bryan D. Orthel
article en

Abstract

Heritage work requires collaboration across disciplinary specialties and with the people who create, use, and hold heritage. Communities of practice—like preservationists, interior designers, and historians—inherently rely on systems for structure, organization, relationships, boundaries, and identity. Systems thinking approaches are essential in rapidly changing circumstances. Modeling a complex interdisciplinary system of dynamic parts challenges heritage specialists to consider origins, implications, and consequences distant from, but linked to, heritage itself. Thinking about heritage as part of a system identifies a range of new opportunities and contexts for using and supporting heritage. This essay’s purpose centers on application—in how we use heritage in making decisions—rather than theory. Using a personal story about a longcase clock, the essay demonstrates how systematically thinking about heritage changes the focus of heritage work. The proposed heritage–human–ecology system model emphasizes the interaction of heritage and living.

Journal of Interior DesignVol. 50(4)
Indiana University Bloomington (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 65%
Cultural Heritage Management and Preservation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Systematically Thinking About Heritage — Bryan D. Orthel · Journal of Interior Design (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS