Institutional Policies on Artificial Intelligence in Higher Education: Frameworks and Best Practices for Faculty

ABSTRACT This article explores institutional policies on artificial intelligence (AI) in higher education. As AI tools become increasingly utilized in academia—from research and teaching to assessment and student support—institutions face growing pressure to establish clear, ethical, and practical guidelines to help guide faculty. We examine existing institutional responses to AI adoption, identify common policies, and highlight the growing pressure that exists between innovation, academic integrity, and equitable access. Drawing on three institutional examples and current policy models, an approach to developing faculty‐focused AI policies that promotes transparency, safeguards academic standards, and fosters responsible AI use is proposed. Recommendations are made for policy development that align with institutional missions, faculty autonomy, and the evolving landscape of higher education.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education
Published
2025-11-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/ace.70013
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.65
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Institutional Policies on Artificial Intelligence in Higher Education: Frameworks and Best Practices for Faculty

Daniel J. Mallinson, Eric Best, Lauren Azevedo, Pedro Robles
1 citations
New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
0.65
article

Institutional Policies on Artificial Intelligence in Higher Education: Frameworks and Best Practices for Faculty

Daniel J. Mallinson, Eric Best, Lauren Azevedo, Pedro Robles
article en
1 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT This article explores institutional policies on artificial intelligence (AI) in higher education. As AI tools become increasingly utilized in academia—from research and teaching to assessment and student support—institutions face growing pressure to establish clear, ethical, and practical guidelines to help guide faculty. We examine existing institutional responses to AI adoption, identify common policies, and highlight the growing pressure that exists between innovation, academic integrity, and equitable access. Drawing on three institutional examples and current policy models, an approach to developing faculty‐focused AI policies that promotes transparency, safeguards academic standards, and fosters responsible AI use is proposed. Recommendations are made for policy development that align with institutional missions, faculty autonomy, and the evolving landscape of higher education.

New Directions for Adult and Continuing EducationVol. 2025(188)
University of North Carolina at Charlotte (US), Albany State University (US), Pennsylvania State University (US), Lehigh Valley Hospital-Pocono (US), Lehigh Valley Hospital (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
0.65
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Institutional Policies on Artificial Intelligence in Higher Education: Frameworks and Best Practices for Faculty — Daniel J. Mallinson, Eric Best, et al. · New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS