<scp>Assessment</scp> of Debris Flow Susceptibility Based on <scp>PCA</scp> ‐ <scp>IV</scp> Coupling Method and <scp>SHAP</scp> Model: A Case Study of Linan District

ABSTRACT The evaluation of debris flow susceptibility helps assess both the degree of susceptibility and the spatial distribution characteristics of debris flows in a region, providing a basis for disaster prevention and mitigation planning. However, traditional methods face challenges such as subjective weight calculation and insufficient model interpretability. This study focuses on Lin'an District and constructs a coupling model (PCA‐IV) that combines principal component analysis (PCA) with the information value (IV) method. By applying the SHAP interpretability framework, the reliability of the model's predictions is effectively enhanced. Based on 404 watershed units, nine evaluation indicators were selected, including basin average slope, Melton ratio, engineering geological lithological groups, basin fault density, and average rainfall during the flood season. PCA is used to eliminate multicollinearity among factors and optimize weight calculation, followed by integration with the IV model to classify and quantify the contribution of each indicator. The debris flow susceptibility in Lin'an District is categorized into four levels: Extremely high, High, Medium, and Low. The research results indicate that: (1) The PCA‐IV model achieved an AUC value of 0.89, improving prediction accuracy by 17.6% and 6.5% compared with the single models (IV and PCA), demonstrating good performance. (2) SHAP analysis reveals that rainfall (contributing 28.6%) and slope (23.4%) are the key driving factors in the study area, with a significant interaction between them. (3) The frequency ratio reliability validation shows that the zoning levels produced by the model align with the actual distribution patterns, indicating the model's reliability. This study innovatively combines statistical dimensionality reduction with mechanistic explanation. The proposed PCA‐IV‐SHAP coupling framework, based on watershed units, provides a novel method for debris flow risk assessment that integrates both mathematical reliability and engineering applicability. Compared with more complex algorithmic models, this approach offers clearer physical meaning and can provide valuable technical references for disaster prevention and mitigation in similar mountainous regions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Transactions in GIS
Published
2025-11-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/tgis.70146
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Landslides and related hazards
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.84
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessment of Debris Flow Susceptibility Based on PCA ‐ IV Coupling Method and SHAP Model: A Case Study of Linan District

S. Ni, Hao Chen, Liangxu Shen, Tianxing Ma et al.
2 citations
Transactions in GIS
Landslides and related hazards
4.84
article

Assessment of Debris Flow Susceptibility Based on PCA ‐ IV Coupling Method and SHAP Model: A Case Study of Linan District

S. Ni, Hao Chen, Liangxu Shen, Tianxing Ma, Zhenghua Liu, Hongyue Sun
article en
2 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT The evaluation of debris flow susceptibility helps assess both the degree of susceptibility and the spatial distribution characteristics of debris flows in a region, providing a basis for disaster prevention and mitigation planning. However, traditional methods face challenges such as subjective weight calculation and insufficient model interpretability. This study focuses on Lin'an District and constructs a coupling model (PCA‐IV) that combines principal component analysis (PCA) with the information value (IV) method. By applying the SHAP interpretability framework, the reliability of the model's predictions is effectively enhanced. Based on 404 watershed units, nine evaluation indicators were selected, including basin average slope, Melton ratio, engineering geological lithological groups, basin fault density, and average rainfall during the flood season. PCA is used to eliminate multicollinearity among factors and optimize weight calculation, followed by integration with the IV model to classify and quantify the contribution of each indicator. The debris flow susceptibility in Lin'an District is categorized into four levels: Extremely high, High, Medium, and Low. The research results indicate that: (1) The PCA‐IV model achieved an AUC value of 0.89, improving prediction accuracy by 17.6% and 6.5% compared with the single models (IV and PCA), demonstrating good performance. (2) SHAP analysis reveals that rainfall (contributing 28.6%) and slope (23.4%) are the key driving factors in the study area, with a significant interaction between them. (3) The frequency ratio reliability validation shows that the zoning levels produced by the model align with the actual distribution patterns, indicating the model's reliability. This study innovatively combines statistical dimensionality reduction with mechanistic explanation. The proposed PCA‐IV‐SHAP coupling framework, based on watershed units, provides a novel method for debris flow risk assessment that integrates both mathematical reliability and engineering applicability. Compared with more complex algorithmic models, this approach offers clearer physical meaning and can provide valuable technical references for disaster prevention and mitigation in similar mountainous regions.

Transactions in GISVol. 29(7)
Zhejiang Ocean University (CN), Zhejiang Institute of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering (CN), Shanghai Institute of Geological Survey (CN), Zhejiang University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Landslides and related hazards
4.84
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.