Bimodal Input in Processing and Learning of Novel Vocabulary During Reading: An Eye‐Tracking Study

Abstract This study compared the effectiveness of written versus bimodal input on the processing and learning of novel words in a text. While their eye movements were recorded, 59 university‐level second language (L2) English readers read a 9,500‐word text containing 24 unfamiliar words over 2 consecutive days in one of two conditions: reading only and reading while listening. Vocabulary development was assessed with a real‐time sentence‐reading test and form recognition, meaning recall, and meaning recognition tests both immediately after the second day's learning session and 1 week later. Both modalities accelerated the processing of unfamiliar words across exposures during reading, but bimodal input induced numerically longer gaze durations on initial encounters and was more effective for learning word forms. However, neither modality supported fluent retrieval of the learned words in neutral contexts. Whereas exposure frequency predicted the learning of word forms and meanings, amount of attention predicted only word form learning.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Language Learning
Published
2025-11-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.70017
Primary Topic
Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Bimodal Input in Processing and Learning of Novel Vocabulary During Reading: An Eye‐Tracking Study

Ayşen Tuzcu, Shawn Loewen
Language Learning
Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
article

Bimodal Input in Processing and Learning of Novel Vocabulary During Reading: An Eye‐Tracking Study

Ayşen Tuzcu, Shawn Loewen
article en

Abstract

Abstract This study compared the effectiveness of written versus bimodal input on the processing and learning of novel words in a text. While their eye movements were recorded, 59 university‐level second language (L2) English readers read a 9,500‐word text containing 24 unfamiliar words over 2 consecutive days in one of two conditions: reading only and reading while listening. Vocabulary development was assessed with a real‐time sentence‐reading test and form recognition, meaning recall, and meaning recognition tests both immediately after the second day's learning session and 1 week later. Both modalities accelerated the processing of unfamiliar words across exposures during reading, but bimodal input induced numerically longer gaze durations on initial encounters and was more effective for learning word forms. However, neither modality supported fluent retrieval of the learned words in neutral contexts. Whereas exposure frequency predicted the learning of word forms and meanings, amount of attention predicted only word form learning.

Language Learning
Michigan State University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 64%
Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Bimodal Input in Processing and Learning of Novel Vocabulary During Reading: An Eye‐Tracking Study — Ayşen Tuzcu, Shawn Loewen · Language Learning (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS