Fine‐tuning the buzz: comparing visitation frequency and pollination effectiveness in plant–pollinator networks

Ecological network approaches have advanced our understanding of how species interactions influence community and evolutionary dynamics. However, a key limitation is that most network analyses rely solely on visitation data, often overlooking functional aspects of interactions. Here, we combined quantitative (visitation frequency) and qualitative (pollen removal and deposition) components to assess bee interactions with buzz-pollinated flowers in the field. We recorded bee visitation to Chamaecrista (Fabaceae) flowers to represent the quantitative component and conducted single-visit experiments to evaluate qualitative components related to male and female reproductive performances. Data were integrated into ecological networks to explore the structure of plant-pollinator interactions. Across 1838 interactions involving 10 plant species, flower-buzzing bees were the most effective pollen depositors, while robbers removed large amounts of pollen but frequently damaged floral structures. Network analyses revealed that male performance components generated more specialised and modular networks than those based on visitation or female performance, highlighting functional differences among bee groups. While visitation networks offered partial insights, inclusion of pollination effectiveness metrics revealed the importance of specialised vibration behaviours in plant reproductive performance. We emphasise integration of both quantitative and qualitative data to better predict ecological and evolutionary dynamics in specialised pollination systems.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
New Phytologist
Published
2025-11-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.70758
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Plant and animal studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.05
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Fine‐tuning the buzz: comparing visitation frequency and pollination effectiveness in plant–pollinator networks

André Rodrigo Rech, Pamela Cristina Santana, Lorena B. Valadão‐Mendes, Pietro K. Maruyama et al.
2 citations
New Phytologist
Plant and animal studies
6.05
article

Fine‐tuning the buzz: comparing visitation frequency and pollination effectiveness in plant–pollinator networks

André Rodrigo Rech, Pamela Cristina Santana, Lorena B. Valadão‐Mendes, Pietro K. Maruyama, Vinícius Lourenço Garcia de Brito
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Ecological network approaches have advanced our understanding of how species interactions influence community and evolutionary dynamics. However, a key limitation is that most network analyses rely solely on visitation data, often overlooking functional aspects of interactions. Here, we combined quantitative (visitation frequency) and qualitative (pollen removal and deposition) components to assess bee interactions with buzz-pollinated flowers in the field. We recorded bee visitation to Chamaecrista (Fabaceae) flowers to represent the quantitative component and conducted single-visit experiments to evaluate qualitative components related to male and female reproductive performances. Data were integrated into ecological networks to explore the structure of plant-pollinator interactions. Across 1838 interactions involving 10 plant species, flower-buzzing bees were the most effective pollen depositors, while robbers removed large amounts of pollen but frequently damaged floral structures. Network analyses revealed that male performance components generated more specialised and modular networks than those based on visitation or female performance, highlighting functional differences among bee groups. While visitation networks offered partial insights, inclusion of pollination effectiveness metrics revealed the importance of specialised vibration behaviours in plant reproductive performance. We emphasise integration of both quantitative and qualitative data to better predict ecological and evolutionary dynamics in specialised pollination systems.

New PhytologistVol. 249(4)
Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (BR), Instituto Federal de Educação, Ciência e Tecnologia de Minas Gerais (BR), Lund University (SE), Universidade Federal dos Vales do Jequitinhonha e Mucuri (BR), Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (BR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Plant and animal studies
6.05
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.