Exploring digital modeling in line manufacturing implementation and management: reinterpreting human agency as a critical (success) factor

This study investigates the limitations of digital modeling and digital twin technologies in line manufacturing, emphasizing the critical role of human agency in successful implementation. Using a multiple case study approach, we analyzed eleven implementation projects across seven manufacturing firms. The findings show that while digital tools support equipment-related decision-making and process optimization, they often fall short in capturing tacit knowledge, experiential expertise, and adaptive judgment. Projects with stronger integration of employee competencies, particularly in contexts of process variability and organizational change, demonstrated more effective outcomes. Overreliance on digital tools can obscure the contributions of human actors, leading to inefficiencies and implementation challenges. We argue that implementation strategies must move beyond purely technological solutions to explicitly incorporate human-centric capabilities. This research advocates for a reconfiguration of current digitalization frameworks to explicitly recognize and embed human-centric capabilities in the design and deployment of advanced manufacturing systems.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Production & Manufacturing Research
Published
2025-11-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/21693277.2025.2586575
Primary Topic
Digital Transformation in Industry
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Exploring digital modeling in line manufacturing implementation and management: reinterpreting human agency as a critical (success) factor

Torben Tambo, Mads Kjærgaard Nielsen
Production & Manufacturing Research
Digital Transformation in Industry
article

Exploring digital modeling in line manufacturing implementation and management: reinterpreting human agency as a critical (success) factor

Torben Tambo, Mads Kjærgaard Nielsen
article en

Abstract

This study investigates the limitations of digital modeling and digital twin technologies in line manufacturing, emphasizing the critical role of human agency in successful implementation. Using a multiple case study approach, we analyzed eleven implementation projects across seven manufacturing firms. The findings show that while digital tools support equipment-related decision-making and process optimization, they often fall short in capturing tacit knowledge, experiential expertise, and adaptive judgment. Projects with stronger integration of employee competencies, particularly in contexts of process variability and organizational change, demonstrated more effective outcomes. Overreliance on digital tools can obscure the contributions of human actors, leading to inefficiencies and implementation challenges. We argue that implementation strategies must move beyond purely technological solutions to explicitly incorporate human-centric capabilities. This research advocates for a reconfiguration of current digitalization frameworks to explicitly recognize and embed human-centric capabilities in the design and deployment of advanced manufacturing systems.

Production & Manufacturing ResearchVol. 13(1)
Aarhus University (DK)
Openalex Percentile: Top 52%
Digital Transformation in Industry
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Exploring digital modeling in line manufacturing implementation and management: reinterpreting human agency as a critical (success) factor — Torben Tambo, Mads Kjærgaard Nielsen · Production & Manufacturing Research (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS