Social norms and international environmental agreements: A natural solution to environmental problems?

We analyze the role of social norms on the size and effectiveness of international environmental agreements. Social norms lead single agents (the countries’ delegates) to make their individual decisions by accounting for the decisions of others, as they might wish to conform to or to deviate from others’ behavior, introducing an additional welfare-effect for individual emission decisions. We show that social norms promote the formation of large stable coalitions, and if social considerations are sufficiently strong it may even be possible to achieve the grand coalition with full participation. However, whether this effectively benefits the environment is not so obvious, as this ultimately depends on whether social considerations are driven by conformism or anti-conformism motives along with the specific configuration of other key parameters. Indeed, (i) if a coalition forms this could be alternatively characterized by pro-environmental or anti-environmental features, in which members end up emitting less or more than non-members, respectively; and (ii) regardless of the characteristics of the coalition, it could happen that members (non-members) increase their emissions more than non-members (members) reduce their own, resulting in an increase in total emissions with respect to what would have happened in the absence of social considerations. Although social norms are often presented as a natural solution to environmental problems, our results suggest that this may not always be the case; in some instances, social considerations may even lead to detrimental environmental outcomes. • Social norms influence coalition size and stability in IEAs. • Strong norms can support full participation in environmental coalitions. • Social norms can lead to formation of anti-environmental coalitions. • Social norms-conformism/anticonformism motives-may raise or lower global emissions. • Social norms are not always beneficial for environmental outcomes.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Energy Economics
Published
2025-11-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2025.109049
Primary Topic
Climate Change Policy and Economics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Social norms and international environmental agreements: A natural solution to environmental problems?

Simone Marsiglio, Nahid Masoudi
Energy Economics
Climate Change Policy and Economics
article

Social norms and international environmental agreements: A natural solution to environmental problems?

Simone Marsiglio, Nahid Masoudi
article en

Abstract

We analyze the role of social norms on the size and effectiveness of international environmental agreements. Social norms lead single agents (the countries’ delegates) to make their individual decisions by accounting for the decisions of others, as they might wish to conform to or to deviate from others’ behavior, introducing an additional welfare-effect for individual emission decisions. We show that social norms promote the formation of large stable coalitions, and if social considerations are sufficiently strong it may even be possible to achieve the grand coalition with full participation. However, whether this effectively benefits the environment is not so obvious, as this ultimately depends on whether social considerations are driven by conformism or anti-conformism motives along with the specific configuration of other key parameters. Indeed, (i) if a coalition forms this could be alternatively characterized by pro-environmental or anti-environmental features, in which members end up emitting less or more than non-members, respectively; and (ii) regardless of the characteristics of the coalition, it could happen that members (non-members) increase their emissions more than non-members (members) reduce their own, resulting in an increase in total emissions with respect to what would have happened in the absence of social considerations. Although social norms are often presented as a natural solution to environmental problems, our results suggest that this may not always be the case; in some instances, social considerations may even lead to detrimental environmental outcomes. • Social norms influence coalition size and stability in IEAs. • Strong norms can support full participation in environmental coalitions. • Social norms can lead to formation of anti-environmental coalitions. • Social norms-conformism/anticonformism motives-may raise or lower global emissions. • Social norms are not always beneficial for environmental outcomes.

Energy EconomicsVol. 153
Openalex Percentile: Top 56%
Climate Change Policy and Economics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.