Novel gaze stability training improves dynamic visual acuity for 6 months

ObjectivesPeripheral vestibular hypofunction (PVH) affects a significant portion of the population and impairs visual acuity during head motion (dynamic visual acuity, DVA). This study compared the effectiveness of a novel gaze stability training called Incremental VOR Adaptation (IVA) versus traditional vestibular physical therapy (VPT) for improving DVA.MethodsThe Incremental Velocity Error as a New Treatment in Vestibular Rehabilitation (INVENT) trial is a randomized, controlled, cross-over study involving 24 participants with chronic unilateral or bilateral PVH. Participants underwent either IVA or VPT for 3 weeks, followed by a washout period and then the alternate intervention (IVA-VPT or VPT-IVA). DVA was measured at baseline, after each intervention, at the completion of the washout period, and at 6-month follow-up.ResultsThere was a significant main effect of treatment Group, <i>F</i> (1,19) = 7.75, <i>p</i> = 0.012, with (IVA-VPT) consistently demonstrating lower DVA scores than VPT-IVA. A significant main effect of Side was also observed, <i>F</i> (1,19) = 13.35, <i>p</i> = 0.0017, indicating lower DVA scores for contralesional compared to ipsilesional head rotation. We found no effect of Time (<i>F</i> (4,76) = 1.44, <i>p</i> = 0.23), suggesting that scores remained stable from baseline through the 6-months follow-up. There were no significant interactions, including Group × Side (<i>F</i> (1,19) = 0.11, <i>p</i> = 0.74), Group × Time (<i>F</i> (4,76) = 1.33, <i>p</i> = 0.27), or Group × Side × Time (<i>F</i> (4,76) = 0.59, <i>p</i> = 0.67).ConclusionDVA scores were consistently better at all time points after participants completed IVA. Using an intent to treat analysis, with no baseline demographic differences between groups, our data support that exposure to the first gaze stability training type exerts a stable influence on DVA that persisted to 6-month follow-up. Clinically, this implies that once DVA improvements are established through either IVA or VPT, they tend to remain stable over 6 months.Level of EvidenceLevel 2.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Vestibular Research
Published
2025-11-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/09574271251400311
Primary Topic
Vestibular and auditory disorders
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Novel gaze stability training improves dynamic visual acuity for 6 months

Colin R. Grove, Americo A. Migliaccio, Daniel Ludwig, Amrita Mukunda et al.
Journal of Vestibular Research
Vestibular and auditory disorders
article

Novel gaze stability training improves dynamic visual acuity for 6 months

Colin R. Grove, Americo A. Migliaccio, Daniel Ludwig, Amrita Mukunda, Jamie Perin, Ann‐Margret Ervin, Jennifer L. Millar
article en

Abstract

ObjectivesPeripheral vestibular hypofunction (PVH) affects a significant portion of the population and impairs visual acuity during head motion (dynamic visual acuity, DVA). This study compared the effectiveness of a novel gaze stability training called Incremental VOR Adaptation (IVA) versus traditional vestibular physical therapy (VPT) for improving DVA.MethodsThe Incremental Velocity Error as a New Treatment in Vestibular Rehabilitation (INVENT) trial is a randomized, controlled, cross-over study involving 24 participants with chronic unilateral or bilateral PVH. Participants underwent either IVA or VPT for 3 weeks, followed by a washout period and then the alternate intervention (IVA-VPT or VPT-IVA). DVA was measured at baseline, after each intervention, at the completion of the washout period, and at 6-month follow-up.ResultsThere was a significant main effect of treatment Group, <i>F</i> (1,19) = 7.75, <i>p</i> = 0.012, with (IVA-VPT) consistently demonstrating lower DVA scores than VPT-IVA. A significant main effect of Side was also observed, <i>F</i> (1,19) = 13.35, <i>p</i> = 0.0017, indicating lower DVA scores for contralesional compared to ipsilesional head rotation. We found no effect of Time (<i>F</i> (4,76) = 1.44, <i>p</i> = 0.23), suggesting that scores remained stable from baseline through the 6-months follow-up. There were no significant interactions, including Group × Side (<i>F</i> (1,19) = 0.11, <i>p</i> = 0.74), Group × Time (<i>F</i> (4,76) = 1.33, <i>p</i> = 0.27), or Group × Side × Time (<i>F</i> (4,76) = 0.59, <i>p</i> = 0.67).ConclusionDVA scores were consistently better at all time points after participants completed IVA. Using an intent to treat analysis, with no baseline demographic differences between groups, our data support that exposure to the first gaze stability training type exerts a stable influence on DVA that persisted to 6-month follow-up. Clinically, this implies that once DVA improvements are established through either IVA or VPT, they tend to remain stable over 6 months.Level of EvidenceLevel 2.

Journal of Vestibular Research
Johns Hopkins University (US), Emory University (US), Johns Hopkins Medicine (US), UNSW Sydney (AU), Neuroscience Research Australia (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 57%
Vestibular and auditory disorders
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.